I'm not sure why cw keeps coming back. It's like walking into a building multiple times a day, being yelled at and having poop flung at you, only to keep repeating the process.


Maybe he's going for early entry to the jags bandwagon.

 

He'll leave soon enough.  When he jumps back off the bandwagon he'll change his name to something like BearsWarrior and claim that he is a life long Bears fan.   It's what Hoosiers do.

---

1.  Oh that's another one! Every time I post I'm butthurt or upset.

 

2.  I genuinely thought it was funny the way you guys were acting, that's how I really feel. Despite what you guys are trying to infer through a post 

 

EDIT: Actually, if anything you guys were butthurt I thought it was funny.     

1.  That is patently untrue.  When you post your picks in the This week in the AFCS threads, nobody accuses you of being butthurt then.  Now when you post other stuff in those threads..maybe.  But not when you post your picks.

 

2.  If you genuinely thought our reactions to the game were funny, you don't understand the concept of divisional rivalry.

---

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!

Oh that's another one! Every time I post I'm butthurt or upset.

 

I genuinely thought it was funny the way you guys were acting, that's how I really feel. Despite what you guys are trying to infer through a post 

 

EDIT: Actually, if anything you guys were butthurt I thought it was funny.     

 

I read way too much of this thread to really care. 

 

By the way, calling Jaguars fans whiners is pretty funny.  When they go to certain Colts message boards they are banned automatically if they say anything out of line, but we are the ones who can't take a little trash talk...right?

 

Lets be honest, there are certain posters from other teams that come here to chat football and are well respected.  There are others that come here only to be annoying and pick fights.  You are the latter for the most part.

---

He'll leave soon enough.  When he jumps back off the bandwagon he'll change his name to something like BearsWarrior and claim that he is a life long Bears fan.   It's what Hoosiers do.

 

When have I ever left? I know the thought of that worries you.

 

Also, can you put a word in with Irsay for me and tell him to can Pagano/Grigson?

 

1.  That is patently untrue.  When you post your picks in the This week in the AFCS threads, nobody accuses you of being butthurt then.  Now when you post other stuff in those threads..maybe.  But not when you post your picks.

 

Actually, not true. One fan was IRATE I picked the Bucs to beat the Jags (PS- I was RIGHT).

 

Plus, how could even the most irrational fans (90% of posters on this board) get mad over picks? If I post literally anything else I'm all of the above.

---

When have I ever left? I know the thought of that worries you.

 

Also, can you put a word in with Irsay for me and tell him to can Pagano/Grigson?

 

 

Actually, not true. One fan was IRATE I picked the Bucs to beat the Jags (PS- I was RIGHT).

 

Plus, how could even the most irrational fans (90% of posters on this board) get mad over picks? If I post literally anything else I'm all of the above.

I certainly haven't cared enough to inventory your posts.  But one fan was irate at one pick?  So by your own words, the rest of the picks you made were not met with charges of you being butthurt or upset.

 

But your posts in the aftermath of the shellacking we gave you offend traditional notions of common sense, ignore football realities and defy logic, all in one fell swoop.

 

The Jaguars put up 51 on your team in a major beat down that left Clots fans and media alike in stunned disbelief.

 

While the vultures left on your schedule pick over the rotting carcass of your franchise, I'm sure you'll understand (maybe not) having fun at Clots expense on our board, instead of the overbearing indifference Colts fans show over football matters.

---

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!

I certainly haven't cared enough to inventory your posts. But one fan was irate at one pick? So by your own words, the rest of the picks you made were not met with charges of you being butthurt or upset.


But your posts in the aftermath of the shellacking we gave you offend traditional notions of common sense, ignore football realities and defy logic, all in one fell swoop.


The Jaguars put up 51 on your team in a major beat down that left Clots fans and media alike in stunned disbelief.


While the vultures left on your schedule pick over the rotting carcass of your franchise, I'm sure you'll understand (maybe not) having fun at Clots expense on our board, instead of the overbearing indifference Colts fans show over football matters.

50% of clots fans have been broncos fans for the past couple years, the rest are eating pork tenderloin sandwiches alone with a Peyton Manning clots jersey sitting across from them, tears rolling down their face onto the bun not nearly big enough for the contents.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

When have I ever left? I know the thought of that worries you.

 

You'll jump off the bandwagon when they start losing almost as quickly as you (and most colts "fans") jumped on when they started winning.  Its what you do.  Worried?  Not at all, that would require me to care a whole lot more about you than I do.

---

50% of clots fans have been broncos fans for the past couple years, the rest are eating pork tenderloin sandwiches alone with a Peyton Manning clots jersey sitting across from them, tears rolling down their face onto the bun not nearly big enough for the contents.

 

Hey man, easy on the Pork Tenderloin sandwiches... They may be a heart attack on a plate but those things are GOOD!  LOL

---

Hey man, easy on the Pork Tenderloin sandwiches... They may be a heart attack on a plate but those things are GOOD! LOL

I never said they weren't delicious! My favorite is at the aristocrat pub. I'd kill for one right now.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

I never said they weren't delicious! My favorite is at the aristocrat pub. I'd kill for one right now.

 

Nickle Plate in Fishers!  

---

50% of clots fans have been broncos fans for the past couple years, the rest are eating pork tenderloin sandwiches alone with a Peyton Manning clots jersey sitting across from them, tears rolling down their face onto the bun not nearly big enough for the contents.

 

 

You'll jump off the bandwagon when they start losing almost as quickly as you (and most colts "fans") jumped on when they started winning.  Its what you do.  Worried?  Not at all, that would require me to care a whole lot more about you than I do.

 

Neither of you know me well at all.

 

Also, Perky is that a no on the Irsay thing?

---

I think all the opposition fans think the Hurns throw was nearly picked because their qb hasn't got the arm to get it there on time.


Best qb in the AFC South.


Near interceptions? he's only thrown 2 more than Luck in about 6-7 more games.

---

I think all the opposition fans think the Hurns throw was nearly picked because their qb hasn't got the arm to get it there on time.

 

The 80 yard touchdown? I'm actually not even counting that as one of the 4-5 should of been INTs.

 

I just find it funny you rip Luck for it, but won't even bring it up/make excuses when it comes to Bortles.

---

Neither of you know me well at all.

 

Also, Perky is that a no on the Irsay thing?

 

Still bothers you that I met the man once huh?        

 

Good.

---

List them then:


No way Jackson regularly catches diving interceptions at ankle level...


Either way best qb in the AFC South. Is there an area of Luck's game that is better? He even makes less boneheaded throws than Luck and that's Bortles biggest weakness.

---

The 80 yard touchdown? I'm actually not even counting that as one of the 4-5 should of been INTs.


I just find it funny you rip Luck for it, but won't even bring it up/make excuses when it comes to Bortles.

Maybe because at this point, bortles isn't costing us games like luck was costing the clots.


Maybe because bortles doesn't even have 2 full seasons under his belt.


Maybe because bortles is running a totally different offense this season than he was in year 1.


I could go on. The bottom line is bortles has continually been getting better and improving his entire career, luck has pretty much been at his peak since college.


If bortles is still doing that in a season and a half and costing the jaguars games, then come see me.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

Not to mention Bortles is playing at a higher level than Luck was year 2 and Colts fans were calling Luck elite and mentioning the HOF. Don't see any jags fans doing that with Bortles.

---

Maybe because at this point, bortles isn't costing us games like luck was costing the clots.


Maybe because bortles doesn't even have 2 full seasons under his belt.


Maybe because bortles is running a totally different offense this season than he was in year 1.


I could go on. The bottom line is bortles has continually been getting better and improving his entire career, luck has pretty much been at his peak since college.


If bortles is still doing that in a season and a half and costing the jaguars games, then come see me.

 

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/beysLRkqe0Y/maxresdefault.jpg

---

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://i.ytimg.com/vi/beysLRkqe0Y/maxresdefault.jpg'>https://i.ytimg.com/vi/beysLRkqe0Y/maxresdefault.jpg</a>

Great argument. Really flexing that clot fan IQ. I'm impressed it was actually a full photo.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

Great argument. Really flexing that clot fan IQ. I'm impressed it was actually a full photo.

 

Oh you really wanted a response? I thought it was pretty obvious your whole post was a joke.

 

"Maybe because at this point, bortles isn't costing us games like luck was costing the clots."

- He has cost you MANY games. And many times he tried (Bills this year). This god of a QB is 5-8. He's not making playoffs this year. Again.

 

"Maybe because bortles doesn't even have 2 full seasons under his belt."

-What does this have to do with throwing should-be INTs? Is this a real argument for him? Do you already run out of excuses at excuse #2?

 

"Maybe because bortles is running a totally different offense this season than he was in year 1."

-What's your point? Luck has had 3 different OCs in 4 years too. By this logic, Luck's "should be INTs" are negated, too. Right loa?!?!

 

You're a full fledged homer, just as you call me one. 

---