The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Do the Titans have ownership issues?
|
Let's not forget that Gus came in with a similar roster to what Mularkey had, and came away with twice the wins. I mean yeah we added... Luke Joeckel? Sure, we had MJD for longer, but MJD was old by then. And to make up for it Mularkey had the drunk driver for more games than Gus did. Our receivers when Gus came in were basically Cecil Shorts, Ace Sanders, and Mike Brown. Two of these are out of the league already.
I was wrong about Trent Baalke.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:Let's not forget that Gus came in with a similar roster to what Mularkey had, and came away with twice the wins. I mean yeah we added... Luke Joeckel? Sure, we had MJD for longer, but MJD was old by then. And to make up for it Mularkey had the drunk driver for more games than Gus did. Our receivers when Gus came in were basically Cecil Shorts, Ace Sanders, and Mike Brown. Two of these are out of the league already. Mularkey stated when his staff put together the "roster" that Gene gave him, they could only come up with 46 players they could actually place. Couldn't even "build" a full roster. I'd say that's clearly worse than what Dave and Gus put together the first year. He was given a single year to do what Gus and Dave still haven't done in several.
"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."
Quote:Mularkey stated when his staff put together the "roster" that Gene gave him, they could only come up with 46 players they could actually place. So you think Dave Caldwell should not have fired Mike Mularkey? I thought everybody on the board was happy when that happened. Quote:So you think Dave Caldwell should not have fired Mike Mularkey? I thought everybody on the board was happy when that happened. I'm saying he was far from the biggest problem. He was placed (and accepted the role to be) in a no win situation. He was given a single year on a project that spanned multiple years. You can't judge what he did in a single year on that.
"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."
Quote:I'm saying he was far from the biggest problem. I know he was not the biggest problem. The roster was all Gene Smith's fault. That does not mean Mike Mularkey will prove to me a better coach than he is at Tennessee. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
It's too bad they didn't hold Bradley to the Mularky Standard.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato
Quote:It's too bad they didn't hold Bradley to the Mularky Standard. No it's not. We got better with Bradley. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.