Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
It Makes Me Sick...

#61

Quote:So hiking the ball over the QB's head for a safety for the Jags to take the lead is impressive to you?

 

Are you becoming soft on us?
 

No one is saying that Cleveland didn't also make mistakes. 

 

But even after that bad snap, Cleveland could have easily still won the game and even took the lead again. The Jags went down and made the game winner. 

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#62

Quote:I hope that doesn't happen. Houston getting -the guy- at QB would be a disaster for us. 
 

That's where we are heading.  I'd be much happier if it were Minnesota or someone else getting #1 .... just not Houston.

Reply

#63

Quote:That's where we are heading.  I'd be much happier if it were Minnesota or someone else getting #1 .... just not Houston.
 

To be honest, I don't want Houston getting Bridgewater, Clowney or Barr. 

 

I can live with it if Houston takes Carr. I think the constant comparisons to his brother while there would be a negative intangible. 

Reply

#64
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2013, 03:29 PM by Perkolater.)

Quote:The Jags went down and made the game winner. 
 

LOL!! Except in another thread you don't think Shorts actually had possession!

 

 


Quote: The ball was not secured as he was going out of the EZ.

 

 

Yep, the above shows/ confirms what I saw. 

 

 

I don't see it as full possession. I think you can only have full possession when the ball is secured and not moving. 

 

 

 

 

Dang, you flip-flop from thread to thread.

 

Thanks for the laugh!   Laughing


Reply

#65

Quote:LOL!! Except in another thread you don't think Shorts actually had possession!

 

 

<div> 
 

Dang, you flip-flop from thread to thread.

 

Thanks for the laugh!   Laughing

</div>
 

I saw the ball still moving. I didn't think it should have been a TD per my interpretation of the rules. 

 

That doesn't discredit what the Jags did in the game to win the game, clown

 

I'm guessing you had big red shoes and a big plastic nose while making the above post. 

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#66
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2013, 04:06 PM by Perkolater.)

Quote:I saw the ball still moving. I didn't think it should have been a TD per my interpretation of the rules. 

 

That doesn't discredit what the Jags did in the game to win the game, clown

 

I'm guessing you had big red shoes and a big plastic nose while making the above post. 
 

That guess is about as accurate as most of your posts.  

 

Big difference between:

 

"I saw the ball still moving. I didn't think it should have been a TD.....That doesn't discredit what the Jags did in the game to win the game"   and "The Jags went down and made the game winner."

 

So you give the Jags credit for going down and making the game winner, except for the fact that you don't think they made the game winner.   Yeah, no contradiction there.

 

Thanks again for the laugh!   


Reply

#67

So TMD, did the Jags make the game winner or not????


Reply

#68

Quote:So TMD, did the Jags make the game winner or not????
 

They were credited in the W column, so I'd say thats a stupid question. 

Reply

#69

Quote:They were credited in the W column, so I'd say thats a stupid question.
 

Agreed.  It is stupid.

 

 Shouldn't have to ask why someone would give credit for a game winning play in one thread and that same person would claim they didn't make the play in another.  

 

But, since that happened, how about an answering the question?  

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#70

Quote:Agreed.  It is stupid.

 

 Shouldn't have to ask why someone would give credit for a game winning play in one thread and that same person would claim they didn't make the play in another.  

 

But, since that happened, how about an answering the question?  
 

The other thread was discussing about if the official made the correct call. I didn't think Shorts had it secured. Either way, thats one play you're harping over. If that play wasn't ruled a catch that doesn't mean the Jags still didn't play well for the entire game, clown. No one knows what would have happened; they could have went right back and scored anyway on the next play. You're trying so hard, yet nothings there. 

Reply

#71

Quote:That's where we are heading. I'd be much happier if it were Minnesota or someone else getting #1 .... just not Houston.
id much rather Houston get Teddy than Clowney in the 1st and a Qb like Petty or McCarron in the 2nd
Reply

#72

Quote:id much rather Houston get Teddy than Clowney in the 1st and a Qb like Petty or McCarron in the 2nd
 

Petty is staying in school, and yeah, I agree that I don't want the Texans getting both Clowney and McCarron, that would be a disaster for us. 

 

I don't want them getting Bridgewater either though. Just give them Carr's brother, thats the lesser of evils. 

Reply

#73

LOL! You give credit for the Jags driving down to make the winning play in one thread, and claim they didn't make the play in another, but I'm a clown? 


You crack me up TMD!    Laughs like that deserve a reward. Meet me in the East Club this Thursday night and I'll buy you a beer.  


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#74

DISGUSTING...
Reply

#75

Longest winning streak in the AFC...


It's like they don't even care!?!
Reply

#76

Why don't they focus on how happy I want to be next year instead of how happy they can be now?!?!?!?!

 

 

-- By the way Mods, we really need a foot stomping tantrum emoticon-smiley face. We all know it. --


I'm trying to make myself more informed and less opinionated.

Stop saying whatever stupid thing you're talking about and pay attention to all the interesting things I have to say!
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!