Interesting that you defend property rights when Trump thinks Imminent Domain is a great thing. 

 

I'm not a Trumpet. I'm just commenting on the prioritization of rights in our society.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

You do know Byrd had completely changed his views on race and supported Obama for president in 2008 right? which is why Hilary was respectful of him. 

 

http://www.politico.com/blogs/ben-smith/...ama-008895

 

As for Bill, the majority of African americans support him, but also take issue with him for implementing the 3 strikes law which has imprisoned just as many black people during his presidency  than Regan. 

 

That is where most black people's outrage is at with him. 

 

he's just exposing a double standard. people who are going to be voting for Hillary have no business being upset about the Trump/Duke disavowing timeline.

---

he's just exposing a double standard. people who are going to be voting for Hillary have no business being upset about the Trump/Duke disavowing timeline.

 

Did you even bother reading the link I posted?

 

Robert Byrd and David Duke share different ideologies. 

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

You do know Byrd had completely changed his views on race and supported Obama for president in 2008 right? which is why Hilary was respectful of him. 

 

http://www.politico.com/blogs/ben-smith/...ama-008895

 

As for Bill, the majority of African americans support him, but also take issue with him for implementing the 3 strikes law which has imprisoned just as many black people during his presidency  than Regan. 

 

That is where most black people's outrage is at with him. 

 

So then why the outrage for Donald Trump who's never held those views at all, much less recanted them for political purposes? Because it's all they got and they'll do their best to destroy him with it. Even though it's as significant as a grain of sand against a tidal wave.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

So then why the outrage for Donald Trump who's never held those views at all, much less recanted them for political purposes? Because it's all they got and they'll do their best to destroy him with it. Even though it's as significant as a grain of sand against a tidal wave.

 

Donald Trump has a history of making incendiary racists remarks going back to questioning Obama's birth certificate and U.S. citizenship.

 

He was sued by the Justice Department for racial discrimination which he settled later on.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/29...55553.html

 

He has a history of this behavior. 

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dona...60bf777e83

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

Donald Trump has a history of making incendiary racists remarks going back to questioning Obama's birth certificate and U.S. citizenship.

 

He was sued by the Justice Department for racial discrimination which he settled later on.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/29...55553.html

 

He has a history of this behavior. 

 

That's what you've got? That is the same as being a Grand Kleagle? Seriously? Sand grain meet Tidal Wave.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Did you even bother reading the link I posted?

 

Robert Byrd and David Duke share different ideologies. 

 

dude, he was a grand wizard or some nonsense. that's hardcore and you cant tell me had Trump said he was his mentor, people would be losing their minds.

---

That's what you've got? That is the same as being a Grand Kleagle? Seriously? Sand grain meet Tidal Wave.

 

You can at least thank me for giving you facts.

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

dude, he was a grand wizard or some nonsense. that's hardcore and you cant tell me had Trump said he was his mentor, people would be losing their minds.

 

Hilary respected Byrd because he changed his views on race, and supported Obama.

 

Some Trump supports are so twisted, they don't even realized he contributed to Hilary during her run in 2008. 

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/do...ton-119071

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

Hilary respected Byrd because he changed his views on race, and supported Obama.


Some Trump supports are so twisted, they don't even realized he contributed to Hilary during her run in 2008.

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/donald-trump-donations-democrats-hillary-clinton-119071'>http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/donald-trump-donations-democrats-hillary-clinton-119071</a>

I think anyone who has at least attempted to watch a republican debate knows that he donated to that wildebeest

---

You can at least thank me for giving you facts.

 

What facts are you getting from the HuffPo, that some people don't like Trump? That one guy wrote a book about him? That the Justice Department wasted the court's time with frivolous lawsuits? Yeah, those aren't really the "facts" you're trying to parade here.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

I think anyone who has at least attempted to watch a republican debate knows that he donated to that wildebeest

 

My point is Trump doesnt have the GOP's best interest. 

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

My point is Trump doesnt have the GOP's best interest. 

 

Good?

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

What facts are you getting from the HuffPo, that some people don't like Trump? That one guy wrote a book about him? That the Justice Department wasted the court's time with frivolous lawsuits? Yeah, those aren't really the "facts" you're trying to parade here.

 

So now the Justice Department "wasted" the courts time with "frivolous" lawsuit that Trump settled with them?

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

My point is Trump doesnt have the GOP's best interest.

Personally, only speaking for myself, I don't care if he doesn't have The GOP's best interest. I want him for America's best interest.

---

My point is Trump doesnt have the GOP's best interest. 

Which is why his support is so high right now. People want someone who isn't in bed with companies, donors, etc., funding them and making decisions for those companies, donors, etc., and not the betterment of the entire country as a whole.

---

TravC59, aka JacksJags. @TravC59 on Twitter
;
; "This is really good, you want a bite, Honey?"

Which is why his support is so high right now. People want someone who isn't in bed with companies, donors, etc., funding them and making decisions for those companies, donors, etc., and not the betterment of the entire country as a whole.

 

That'd be great, if that person wasn't one of those donors themselves.  Trump just cut out the middle man.  

---

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 

That'd be great, if that person wasn't one of those donors themselves.  Trump just cut out the middle man.  

Possibly. Point still stands that people are tired with career politicians. There isn't a whole lot to lose. Hillary should be in jail. To many are allowing the media to dictate their thoughts. 

---

TravC59, aka JacksJags. @TravC59 on Twitter
;
; "This is really good, you want a bite, Honey?"

So now the Justice Department "wasted" the courts time with "frivolous" lawsuit that Trump settled with them?

 

Yes, companies settle all the time, it's not an admission of guilt and often cheaper than winning a lawsuit.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Which is why his support is so high right now. People want someone who isn't in bed with companies, donors, etc., funding them and making decisions for those companies, donors, etc., and not the betterment of the entire country as a whole.

The definition of "betterment of the entire country" is a very loose one when considering Trump's platform and rhetoric.

---