<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.factcheck.org/2015/07/was-hillary-clinton-the-original-birther/'>Simply not true.</a>


Yet another example of you reading something on one of your favorite "news" sites and accepting it as truth, without any fact checking.

Lol... Yeg her campaign just went off on their own.

---

Okay, just wondering since it hasn't been brought up, where does the board stand on Trump saying with no hesitation that he would force the military to carry out war crimes like targeting civillians and torture?


Just curious.

 

I'm not for torture except in the most extreme cases, I am for execution though. Intentionally targeting known civilians is abhorrent.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Post #159

Didnt answer the question

---

Lol... Yeg her campaign just went off on their own.

 

It was just "passionate" supports of the campaign. I'm sure her integrity wouldn't permit any of that sort of thing, especially if there was no way to prove it.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

I get better practice with my 4 year old, lol.

Kid must win a lot.

 

I'm not for torture except in the most extreme cases, I am for execution though. Intentionally targeting known civilians is abhorrent.

And yet many on this board support a man who believes that killing the civilians who happen to be related to terrorists is something we should be doing.

 

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/face-the-nat...e-sanders/

 

"Well, I would go after -- well, at least I would certainly go after the wives who absolutely knew what was happening. And I guess your definition of what I would do, I'm going to leave that to your imagination." -Donald Trump

---

Lol... Yeg her campaign just went off on their own.

 

I assume you didn't read the entire article, it was not from her or her campaign. You like to declare suspicion as fact.

 

As I thought, you have no proof. By your logic, Trump is responsible for anything done by his followers.

 

Either way, Trump took the Birther movement to a new level.

---

If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley


 

The definition of "betterment of the entire country" is a very loose one when considering Trump's platform and rhetoric.

I understand this and not the point I was trying to make. You are running with what you want here. The point, again, is that many are tired of career politicians and willing to try their hand somewhere else.

---

TravC59, aka JacksJags. @TravC59 on Twitter
;
; "This is really good, you want a bite, Honey?"

You're saying the GOP base has finally come to the realization that the GOP establishment is a bunch of lying whores?

 

Well, we can agree on that.    

Both sides are...who you trying to kid?

---

TravC59, aka JacksJags. @TravC59 on Twitter
;
; "This is really good, you want a bite, Honey?"

I understand this and not the point I was trying to make. You are running with what you want here. The point, again, is that many are tired of career politicians and willing to try their hand somewhere else.

By flocking to a guy who's been a political insider for decades and, even though he never held office himself, has had Congresspeople in his pocket for 30+ years?

 

If people were truly just tired of insiders running the country, Carson was the logical choice. He was greener than a pine tree in the spring, but he is and was a calm, level-headed thinker rather than a reactionary loudmouth.

 

Let me ask you this: why have the lowest common denominator of white Americans rallied around Trump instead of Carson?

---

I wouldn't call Ben Carson level headed at all.

---

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 

I wouldn't call Ben Carson level headed at all.

I don't mean he always made sense. I mean he didn't stand there spitting fire like Trump does.

---

So let me get this straight. Hillary clinton starts a rumor that barrack obama wasnt born in the country, donald trymp later asks the same question.


Donald trump is the racist?


Ignorance on display folks.

 

 

Link on Hillary starting that rumor?

 

So now someone is "ignorant" for presenting a different viewpoint/opinion?

 

You are getting a little too emotional.

Why debate the birther issue...Trump is doing it again with Cruz. His actions speak. Has Hillary questioned it? Just wondering

---

Blakes Life Matters

Didnt answer the question

I did, you just don't like the answer. Otherwise, you would have had a rebuttal.

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

I assume you didn't read the entire article, it was not from her or her campaign. You like to declare suspicion as fact.


As I thought, you have no proof. By your logic, Trump is responsible for anything done by his followers.


Either way, Trump took the Birther movement to a new level.

Ringo, you and I have either shut down this myth, or question his source and he hasn't come back with a solid rebuttal.

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

I assume you didn't read the entire article, it was not from her or her campaign. You like to declare suspicion as fact.

 

As I thought, you have no proof. By your logic, Trump is responsible for anything done by his followers.

 

Either way, Trump took the Birther movement to a new level.

 

I'm still waiting for him to reveal all that "absolutely unbelievable" stuff his investigators found in Hawaii.  

---

So you're anti-imminent domain now?

 

I have always been against the use of eminent domain to force private property owners to sell to other private interests.  Like forcing a tire store to sell out so a Sears can be built there.  

 

On the other hand, Donald Trump just loooves eminent domain: 

 

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/26...verbruggen

 

 

Here's another one:

 

http://read:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/08/19/donald-trumps-abuse-of-eminent-domain/

 

"When the Supreme Court narrowly upheld “economic development” takings that transfer property to private parties in the 2005 Kelo case, the ruling was widely denounced on both left and right. But Trump defended it stating that “I happen to agree with it 100%. if you have a person living in an area that’s not even necessarily a good area, and … government wants to build a tremendous economic development, where a lot of people are going to be put to work and … create thousands upon thousands of jobs and beautification and lots of other things, I think it happens to be good.”"

---

By flocking to a guy who's been a political insider for decades and, even though he never held office himself, has had Congresspeople in his pocket for 30+ years?

 

If people were truly just tired of insiders running the country, Carson was the logical choice. He was greener than a pine tree in the spring, but he is and was a calm, level-headed thinker rather than a reactionary loudmouth.

 

Let me ask you this: why have the lowest common denominator of white Americans rallied around Trump instead of Carson?

I believe it is because Trump isn't giving PC answers. His blunt takes attract many who are tired of the PC that is running amok in this country. Again, like I have said, it is something different then the normal politician of recent years and elections.

---

TravC59, aka JacksJags. @TravC59 on Twitter
;
; "This is really good, you want a bite, Honey?"

I have always been against the use of eminent domain to force private property owners to sell to other private interests. Like forcing a tire store to sell out so a Sears can be built there.


On the other hand, Donald Trump just loooves eminent domain:

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.nationalreview.com/article/265171/donald-trump-and-eminent-domain-robert-verbruggen'>http://www.nationalreview.com/article/265171/donald-trump-and-eminent-domain-robert-verbruggen</a>



Here's another one:

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://read//www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/08/19/donald-trumps-abuse-of-eminent-domain/'>http://read:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/08/19/donald-trumps-abuse-of-eminent-domain/</a>


"When the Supreme Court narrowly upheld “economic development” takings that transfer property to private parties in the 2005 Kelo case, the ruling <a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/06/04/the-political-and-judicial-reaction-to-kelo/'>was widely denounced on both left and right</a>. But Trump <a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/aug/19/donald-trumps-eminent-domain-nearly-cost-widow-house'>defended it</a> stating that “I happen to agree with it 100%. if you have a person living in an area that’s not even necessarily a good area, and … government wants to build a tremendous economic development, where a lot of people are going to be put to work and … create thousands upon thousands of jobs and beautification and lots of other things, I think it happens to be good.”"

Bernie Sanders is not abolishing eminent domain either so I don't see your point.

---

Ok... Thats what i said its what the candidate said. He said i disavow i dont know and have never met who yore talking about.


Hillary clinton credits robert byrd as a mentor, high up in the kkk. Bill clintons mentor j william fullbright was a segregationist, clinton attended a segregated golf course, signed a bill honoring the confederate flag, had the confederate flag displayed on campaign merchandise, etc. Wheres the outrage?

 

 

You do know Byrd had completely changed his views on race and supported Obama for president in 2008 right? which is why Hilary was respectful of him. 

 

http://www.politico.com/blogs/ben-smith/...ama-008895

 

As for Bill, the majority of African americans support him, but also take issue with him for implementing the 3 strikes law which has imprisoned just as many black people during his presidency  than Regan. 

 

That is where most black people's outrage is at with him. 

 

Robert Byrd actually was a grand kleagle in the kkk and that is absolved because of a political endorsement?  

 

I gave specific instances of direct racist behavior by the Clintons and you didn't address a single one of them.  You just start talking about three strike laws. 

 

Why did he go to a segregated golf course.  Why did he say to Ted Kennedy "You're really going to support this guy?  Back in the day he would have been getting us coffee?"  When was he ever repeatedly asked over a week long period to disavow the campaign merchandise with the confederate flag as a logo.  Why isn't he being asked about that at every campaign stop?

 

I'll tell you why.  Because Black America has been sold a giant bill of goods.  That bill of goods isn't just secular progressivism, it's polylogism.  

 

We have been told that progressivism is so perfect, so pure, and so right for black people that to support it absolves all past sins and racist behavior.  To disagree with progressivism means that you are inherently racist and favor policies that will adversely affect minorities specifically black people.  

 

Never-mind that in reality, progressivism has killed tens of millions of minorities.  Never-mind that progressivism has lead to nothing but shame and degredation for minorities through the collapse of industry.  Progressivism is so right perfect and pure that we cannot even allow DEBATE about its affects and what that means for black people.  That's what the riots in Chicago were about.  God forbid a republican presidential candidate who believes that the private sector offers the greatest opportunity for ALL people speak at a college with a large minority base and actually talk about freedom, trade, low taxes and free enterprise.  

 

The Canary in the cold mine is Margaret Sanger.  This woman started a group expressly for the purpose of limiting the population of minorities and genetic undesirables based on the science of eugenics.  That is the same psychopathic ideology that really lead to the holocaust.  40 MILLION deaths later and you don't even know her name.  But David Duke you hear on a continuous loop over and over again.  The only thing they don't talk about is the fact that Trump Left the reform Party because he thought he was racist and a biggot.  

 

50 years, since Martin Luther king died, 50 years, since Malcom X was died.  50 years of secular progressive politics embracing drugs and the death of the black family.   Where the hell has it gotten us.  Where is the racial utopia?  Where is the achievement?  Where is the success?  first black president, trillion dollar stimulus, 9 trillion dollars in debt, obamacare etc. etc. etc. and black America has actually lost income, wealth, and achievement.   And if someone dares speak up and point out the failures of this experiment called liberalism they're labeled an uncle Tom.  

---

Is Trump a return to the good old days in Italy in 1930s?

---