I guess it's time for you and twisted sister to take the streets and cause havoc. "Were not gonna take it!"


Get out the baseball bats like beyonce and start smashing things cause you didn't get your way. That's what you people are good at.

Lol, you are so triggered, I can see you foaming at the mouth as you spit out, "you people"...


You mad, bro? Calm down. Go watch Bobby knight intro your boy. Take a walk. Something....

---

Looks like Marion County is getting this right.

 

http://www.clickorlando.com/education/ma...ontroversy

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

Lol, you are so triggered, I can see you foaming at the mouth as you spit out, "you people"...


You mad, bro? Calm down. Go watch Bobby knight intro your boy. Take a walk. Something....

 

Foaming at the mouth? no, that's what your people do at these rallies.  They like to spit on any opposition and then claim victim.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6BbzFUeVSE

---

Still foaming, huh? That's your second attempt and my post!


Triggered...


Care to take a 3rd stab?


You people, lol.

---

Yes, YOU people. That's your people.  the angry mentally ill.

---

Yes, YOU people. That's your people.  the angry mentally ill.

Anchorman isn't a Trumpette though.

---

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 

Proceeds to rip the post....

All in an attempt to spread some knowledge, Trav. I can agree with the basic premise while disagreeing with faulty reasoning, right. Its like taking a math exam and somehow getting the correct answer but your work is all jacked up and as a result, you get docked points.


Besides, it isnt in my nature to hurl insults at people I disagree with. I'll walk away first unless you come for me personally which JJ has not done. I can and do respect his opinion even though I disagree with parts of it.

---

<i>Behold man's final mad disgrace.</i>

<i>He chops his nose to spite his face.</i>

 

-Etrigan the Demon

 

The term victim was talking about women who have been taken advantage of.

In not painting anyone. My point is that there has to be am effort to mitigate the potential for bad actors which does exist.

U have also said for the most part people will choose the facility that's appropriate. At the same time if someone is obviously making a scene or posing a threat it shouldn't be taboo to point it out.

Points duly noted and acknowledged. Good discussion. I honestly don't think we are that divergent in our thinking here. Neither of us want to see anyone injured nor accosted in a bathroom...

---

<i>Behold man's final mad disgrace.</i>

<i>He chops his nose to spite his face.</i>

 

-Etrigan the Demon

 

Foaming at the mouth? no, that's what your people do at these rallies.  They like to spit on any opposition and then claim victim.

 

Now I'm triggered. Spitting on someone is patently unacceptable. There's simply no justification for that garbage.

---

<i>Behold man's final mad disgrace.</i>

<i>He chops his nose to spite his face.</i>

 

-Etrigan the Demon

 

All in an attempt to spread some knowledge, Trav. I can agree with the basic premise while disagreeing with faulty reasoning, right. Its like taking a math exam and somehow getting the correct answer but your work is all jacked up and as a result, you get docked points.


Besides, it isnt in my nature to hurl insults at people I disagree with. I'll walk away first unless you come for me personally which JJ has not done. I can and do respect his opinion even though I disagree with parts of it.

It's all opinion was my point in the last post. It is faulty reasoning in your opinion.

---

TravC59, aka JacksJags. @TravC59 on Twitter
;
; "This is really good, you want a bite, Honey?"

Why would anyone in this thread assume they are arguing with straight males?  That is so sexist, homophobic and transphobic!  NOBODY is straight.  There are more than FIFTY genders to choose from now, with more added every week.  You have to accept everyone for who they BELIEVE they are (at this particular moment) not who they really ARE.  We don't need just Mens and Ladies rooms, we need whole corridors of bathroom facilities pertaining to the gender or species I am currently feeling ant any given moment.

 

AND I WON"T STOP THIS NONSENSE UNTIL THE CONCEPT OF GENDER IS MADE TABOO AND ERASED FROM HISTORY!

---

Why would anyone in this thread assume they are arguing with straight males?  That is so sexist, homophobic and transphobic!  NOBODY is straight.  There are more than FIFTY genders to choose from now, with more added every week.  You have to accept everyone for who they BELIEVE they are (at this particular moment) not who they really ARE.  We don't need just Mens and Ladies rooms, we need whole corridors of bathroom facilities pertaining to the gender or species I am currently feeling ant any given moment.

 

AND I WON"T STOP THIS NONSENSE UNTIL THE CONCEPT OF GENDER IS MADE TABOO AND ERASED FROM HISTORY!

I identify now as a billionaire. My bank account is not holding me back anymore.

---

TravC59, aka JacksJags. @TravC59 on Twitter
;
; "This is really good, you want a bite, Honey?"

There were multiple instances of men posing as women, others where men claimed general protection as transgender and one instance where the university of Toronto had to suspend their gender neutral bathroom system because of abuse.


What u refuse to acknowledge is that if the policy encourages or allows "straight dudes with bad intentions" greater or unfettered access to women's facilities then that is a problem. Straight dudes with bad intentions is all that Breitbart fear piece was. It's not a new phenomenon. It was not created by this policy. 21 states and over 250 cities have implemented these laws and no police force or mayor has reported any uptick in incidents you describe. Some have been very complimentary of these policies.



Yo go so far as to dismiss a sex offender being allowed into a woman's restroom. If you can't keep people with Proven records of sexual assault from entering a restroom under this policy then it needs to be seriously rethought. This is why you are dumb. I say "acknowledge" and you say I "dismiss" an incident. You allege I think they should "be allowed" there because I defend the right of actual trans people to use the bathroom they are comfortable with. You think this is the first sex offender to lie in wait in a bathroom he shouldn't be in? Or just the first in a dress? It's irrelevant. Do you know why? Because it is not happening on any scale that registers anywhere except your imagination.



Frankly its callous to sit in the face of real violations of women's privacy and try and waive an urban dictionary at the victims to lecture then on trans transvestitism etc. (I provided a link with definitions above that you obviously missed.) It speaks to an inability to empathize with anyone who doesn't fit your narrow world view. You and your [BLEEP] links. How about some real world experience? I will tell you that I have never encountered a person who was born a boy, identifies as a woman and is sexually attracted to women. That is the extremely improbable scenario you cited as a major sticking point in your argument, right? I still don't know what privacy is being violated when a trans person goes into a bathroom to go #1 or #2. If you could give me any tangible violation of privacy, inconvenience, etc., I would be able to assess whether or not your charge of calling me callous is merited.



I'm glad you know trans people you think highly of. That doesn't change the possibility of your system being abused. I know a lot of straight guys that seem okay. Does that invalidate any and all trans concerns about their safety? How many straight guys do you know that can say they were intimidated or attacked for trying to relieve their bladder? If you are afraid of the policy being abused, you have ONE verified occurrence to stoke the fire. You can spend hours each day scouring the internet and you might get two or three in a year. I will bet you ownership of my message board profile the number of straight guys with bad intentions going into bathrooms dressed as women will never be 1% of the total number of straight guys with bad intentions going into bathrooms.

---

Only a chump boos the home team!

You can lie you can curse you can do whatever. If you think you can speak for all trans women then you're delusional. If you think everyone walking into a bathroom with a wig on is a real trans person then youre delusional If you dismiss the Proven instances of this system being abused then you are delusional.


Next you'll be telling me little boys are really little girls and that gender is just a societal construct with no correlation to biological sex.

---

I identify now as a billionaire. My bank account is not holding me back anymore.

This is indicative of pretty much every other post since I left this thread before the draft.


You invalidate the reality of what a person identifies as by making fun of it.


Maybe it's a lack of compassion. Or a lack of education. Or a lack of maturity.


I have a different perspective than most. I know multiple trans people, and am high school friends with a woman with a very young trans child. I know first hand accounts of things they have gone through and do go through.


Like I said.. I respect everyone's right to think it's "not right" or "sinful". But at some point you have to choose to acknowledge or ignore facts. Your feelings on something, even something you don't like, should not override facts.

---

Only a chump boos the home team!

You can lie you can curse you can do whatever. If you think you can speak for all trans women then you're delusional. If you think everyone walking into a bathroom with a wig on is a real trans person then your delusionyou'rIf you dismiss the Proven instances of this system being abused then you are delusional.


Next you'll be telling me little boys are really little girls and that gender is just a societal construct with no correlation to biological sex.

 

I'm going to start responding to every post you make stating I am in full agreement with whatever you say.  Just so I can see you respond that I am wrong.  

 

This post is just another example of your limited mental capacity.  (and your limited vocabulary --  I'm delusional thrice! --  for actually knowing trans people, but you're master of all things trans for knowing how to Google and read Breitbart).

 

Back under the bridge troll...  

---

Only a chump boos the home team!

Loll. It was intentional, just wanted to drive the point home.


Classic liberal. The world is no bigger than your anecdotes

---

Loll. It was intentional, just wanted to drive the point home.


Classic liberal. The world is no bigger than your anecdotes

Clearly you win then and don't need to post any more?? You accuse me of being delusional, yet never explain why. You call me liberal, because that's a knee jerk response to half my posts. If I respond by calling you "conservative" does it imply all conservatives are mindless, ignorant morons who cannot read, debate or accept reality? Nope. I won't lump in all conservatives with your played out schtick or lack of intelligence.


But to say the world is no bigger than my anecdotes shows you are a mental midget. An anecdote is a short, amusing example. I have provided statistics on a local and national level. I provide real world experience from people I know. I wouldn't call any of it amusing. You support your argument on bull manure articles YOU DON'T FULLY READ and ghost stories. You have zero real world experience on the subject, but "have it ALL figured out."


You reject every fact I state without challenging them and you cling to theories which have been disproved time and again. But I'm delusional.

---

Only a chump boos the home team!

Lol. So making three direct if then statements isn't an explanation? A subordinate clause detailing a specific set of behavior's is blind name calling?


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence


Was it always this easy or did u just not eat your frosted flakes this am?

---

Lol. So making three direct if then statements isn't an explanation? A subordinate clause detailing a specific set of behavior's is blind name calling?

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence'>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence</a>


Was it always this easy or did u just not eat your frosted flakes this am?

So citing verified facts and personal human experience from people I know is cherry picking...


..and you, having never talked to a trans person and refusing to accept any facts I state, while never calling any of them out specifically, while citing a SINGLE occurrence of a straight dude with bad intentions dressed as a woman is NOT cherry picking.


Give me a break dude..


I could say it's day and you would call the sun anecdotal evidence.

---

Only a chump boos the home team!