The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Draft Day 2
|
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:Man I'm thinking Chris Jones has to be the pickNaw we have enough inside guys, now we may get one later in the draft, but we still need guys who are gonna be on the field early, like ILB, OTTO, Edge rusher, or C
<B><FONT color=cyan>Jags this is your year</FONT></B>
Quote:Good Lord we almost had Buckner. That would have been deflatingdodged a bullet
Jeff Fischer welcoming his new rookie QB that he's gonna make a bust. That's gonna be a fun train wreck to watch!
Quote:Jeff Fischer welcoming his new rookie QB that he's gonna make a bust. That's gonna be a fun train wreck to watch!There is going to be a tremendous amount of pressure on Goff to lead the team and perform well. - New team in LA - Pressure to win now - 'Stache's job is on the line - 1st overall pick expectations Season summary? 7-9 at best. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Coming up to midnight. Night two here we go!
Myles Jack has to go early tonight, right?
Quote:@jasoncole Told by #Jaguars source that team won't reach (trade up) for Myles Jack, but might draft him at some point Would be some haul for this team to get Ramsey and Jack.
;
; Quote:Would be some haul for this team to get Ramsey and Jack. Agreed, any chance he falls to.38? Quote:Agreed, any chance he falls to.38? NFL.com mock says yes, but it will be interesting to see what happens We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
We have to go LB or DE, right?
Personally I wouldn't be upset with Hunter Henry. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:We have to go LB or DE, right? Went to San Diego
Jack!
If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley ![]()
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:I have nothing to do for 30 minutes. Type it up. Got distracted. So this diagnosis is only made on radiologic studies. No other way to do so, unless you cut someone open. 1. There is no definite agreement amongst surgeons, radiologists and others about the diameter of an aorta that equals "enlarged". There is a general agreement of an aneurysm at 4 inches, but no one used that word. For enlarged, some use 3", some use 3.5", etc. So some doctors may consider his test as normal. 2. The "measurements" only take into the outside factor of gender. For example, the same measurement guidelines are used by doctors for 5 ft, 3 inch guy and a 6 ft, 5 inch guy. Does that make much sense? Not really. But those factors are not really considered because no one has done the research studies to see how they affect things. 3. Depending on the part of the aorta they are worried about, the way the test is done is of major importance. If it done at the different parts of the heart beat or breathing cycle, you can get different measurements or even introduce motion (blur) into what you are seeing. These could make the aorta appear larger than it actually is. However, you only have 1 test done at 1 time, so you have to make your best guess on that. This is especially true of a college athlete who likely has no prior studies to compare. That is why they said "monitored". That just means they will repeat the scan in 6 months (most likely) or maybe a year to make sure it is enlarged and then to see if it remains stable. Say it is enlarged... Most people with an enlarged aorta have no issues because it stays stable. There is a small increased risk of it continuing to enlarge to become an aneurysm, but unless you have a major genetic condition the rate and timing for that is extremely unknown. If it gets too big you need surgery, but not everyone requires it. But that is a more long term issue, as in 15-25 years down the line. The other major risk of a truly aneurysmal aorta is that there is a risk of an aortic injury in a traumatic situation. For most people this would be a car accident, though some say NFL football plays/tackles can be as violent. So is there some increased risk of an aortic injury if it is enlarged, but remember there is some increased risk for the average person involved in those plays/accidents. For a slightly enlarged aorta, the increased risk is not really quantified.
We've owned this draft boys. Completely put everyone else to shame and we're only two rounds in
|
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.