http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/world/...hands.html

 

at one point Obama is like, "Hey, we're concerned about where these weapons are going."  but then if you continue to do it over and over with the same results.  I'm calling [BLEEP] on your excuses.  You know what you're doing.

---

So no facts. Got it. :-)

 

They didn't arm rebels?

---

Thanks for that info.  It's was a figure of speech.

 

It's a silly figure of speech.  Like "That's like comparing Apples to Oranges".  Apples and Oranges are very comparable.  

---

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 

Assange promises over 100,000 emails detailing these weapons shipments.  Please God in heaven nail these scumbags to the wall.

---

It's a silly figure of speech.  Like "That's like comparing Apples to Oranges".  Apples and Oranges are very comparable.  

 

i dont have time for this. we're discussing real topics here

---

i dont have time for this. we're discussing real topics here

You're praying for an email release that's probably not going to happen.  Yeah, got it.  "real topics"

---

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 

It's a silly figure of speech. Like "That's like comparing Apples to Oranges". Apples and Oranges are very comparable.

I hear ya... And how exactly do you "turn a phrase"? That also seems like a silly saying.

---

You're praying for an email release that's probably not going to happen.  Yeah, got it.  "real topics"

 

oh right, because email releases haven't happened in the past.  ya, it's probably not likely to happen although there's been 100% delivery and accuracy from Assange

---

You're praying for an email release that's probably not going to happen.  Yeah, got it.  "real topics"

He's hoping for it. Clinton is praying for it not to happen.

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

reasonable take:

 

Assange BAAAAAAD

 

Hillary GOOOOOOOD

---

oh right, because email releases haven't happened in the past.  ya, it's probably not likely to happen although there's been 100% delivery and accuracy from Assange

 

No, there's not been 100% delivery and accuracy from Assange.  Not even close.  


I won't be waiting for him to release Trump's Tax returns (which he's also said he's going to get) either.  

---

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 

No, there's not been 100% delivery and accuracy from Assange.  Not even close.  


I won't be waiting for him to release Trump's Tax returns (which he's also said he's going to get) either.  

 

are you kidding? you really think one short "we're working on it" comment on a comedy show is equal to his promises of releasing additional Hillary information when he's promised it over and over again?  information he says they already have.  that's the same?

---

They didn't arm rebels?

So now they are rebels and not jihadists? Lol.


Dude, there is no evidence that proves Obama or Hillary purposely armed Isis.

---

are you kidding? you really think one short "we're working on it" comment on a comedy show is equal to his promises of releasing additional Hillary information when he's promised it over and over again? information he says they already have. that's the same?

They already have it? Why would he not share it if he's already got it?


How long has he been sitting on this information??

---

So now they are rebels and not jihadists? Lol.


Dude, there is no evidence that proves Obama or Hillary purposely armed Isis.

 

did you not read the article?  the headline literally says "Libya jihadists"

 

i say rebels because that's what they are and in many cases are also jihadists.  shouldn't be difficult to understand, but it is you.

 

*evidence provided over and over... "NO PROOF".  you're impossible to deal with.  no desire to find actual truth.  you're just here to shill I guess. please take it elsewhere until you want to look for truth.

---

They already have it? Why would he not share it if he's already got it?


How long has he been sitting on this information??

 

you're clueless.  they have to organize over 100,000 emails so they are searchable in a database.  ya, sounds easy.

---

The title of the article makes it clear the weapons were not intended for isis!!! Lol

---

Again, you would have to just be willfully ignorant or have no internet to not be able to find a number of sources on the topic.  All you do is sit there and say, "WHERE:S THE PROOF" when ive already posted a dozen articles in the past that I guess you didn't read.  Jihadists received our weapons time and time again in Libya and currently in Syria.  That fact can't be disputed.

 

You want to argue its all by accident.  Then whoever is sending these weapons shipments is either really stupid, really wreckless, or a traitor.  I dont think they're stupid, and probably one of the last two or both.

---

The title of the article makes it clear the weapons were not intended for isis!!! Lol

 

You didn't read it.

 

this is the definition of willfully ignorant.

---

you're clueless. they have to organize over 100,000 emails so they are searchable in a database. ya, sounds easy.

So he doesn't know whether or not he has any thing. He's just hoping to find something.


Dude are you reading what you are writing?.


You are literally contradicting everything you've been saying!

---