People aren't annoyed that others want change. Ideally, a message board is a place for people of similar interests to discuss a common interest. What is annoying is that some posters complain for the sake of complaining. Or others who complain about certain aspects of the team even if it is plain obvious that they have no idea what they are talking about. After this debacle of a game vs. the Chargers, here's some examples:

 

*Malik isn't disruptive enough

*Fowler isn't finishing

 

*note* Malik had several pressures vs. SD, one leading to a Fowler sack. The other Fowler sack was caused by blitz pressure (IIRC, it was Poz). 

 

Here's another gem: "linebackers are linebackers. There's no difference. Just play them."

 

Are defensive backs just defensive backs too? How about defensive tackles?

 

There's been a few others as well.

 

Everyone has a right to complain. But if you want to have an actual discussion, bring legitimate points to the table. As it is, this board very often becomes nothing more than a sounding board for complaints rather than an avenue for debate and discussion.

 

Fair enough, I can agree with that.

---

New Jersey Jaguars fan.

People aren't annoyed that others want change. Ideally, a message board is a place for people of similar interests to discuss a common interest. What is annoying is that some posters complain for the sake of complaining. Or others who complain about certain aspects of the team even if it is plain obvious that they have no idea what they are talking about. After this debacle of a game vs. the Chargers, here's some examples:

 

*Malik isn't disruptive enough

*Fowler isn't finishing

 

*note* Malik had several pressures vs. SD, one leading to a Fowler sack. The other Fowler sack was caused by blitz pressure (IIRC, it was Poz). 

 

Here's another gem: "linebackers are linebackers. There's no difference. Just play them."

 

Are defensive backs just defensive backs too? How about defensive tackles?

 

There's been a few others as well.

 

Everyone has a right to complain. But if you want to have an actual discussion, bring legitimate points to the table. As it is, this board very often becomes nothing more than a sounding board for complaints rather than an avenue for debate and discussion.

 

Dude ---we were down 35-0.  That's pretty much a legitimate point to complain about any aspect of the game last week.

 

Your very few points above remind me of the Gus Bradley version of highlighting 2 of 70 plays and building on the momentum that was established last week.

---

I suppose I also must subject myself to re-watch this game. I do not recall Malik having much impact. I can't say I was of a very good mindset after the Chargers ran it down that D-lines throat on the first drive though. Whatever impact you all saw I think we can agree it has to be more.

 

You don't remember that 1 play?

---

I'll be honest...I was [BLEEP] faced early...and I'm glad I was.

---

Have you seen my baseball?

I'll be honest...I was [BAD WORD REMOVED] faced early...and I'm glad I was.

 

That's the one good thing about liking a bad team You get plastered earlier for the wrong reasons

---

New Jersey Jaguars fan.

People aren't annoyed that others want change. Ideally, a message board is a place for people of similar interests to discuss a common interest. What is annoying is that some posters complain for the sake of complaining. Or others who complain about certain aspects of the team even if it is plain obvious that they have no idea what they are talking about. After this debacle of a game vs. the Chargers, here's some examples:

 

*Malik isn't disruptive enough

*Fowler isn't finishing

 

*note* Malik had several pressures vs. SD, one leading to a Fowler sack. The other Fowler sack was caused by blitz pressure (IIRC, it was Poz). 

 

Here's another gem: "linebackers are linebackers. There's no difference. Just play them."

 

Are defensive backs just defensive backs too? How about defensive tackles?

 

There's been a few others as well.

 

Everyone has a right to complain. But if you want to have an actual discussion, bring legitimate points to the table. As it is, this board very often becomes nothing more than a sounding board for complaints rather than an avenue for debate and discussion.

Another post filled with logic and reason. A certain subset of this forum will surely have a problem with this.

---

You don't remember that 1 play?

I must have missed it. But I have been assured by folks on this very message board that he was ballin out this past Sunday.

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

Lol at the attempt for an excuse as to why this coaching staff isn't playing Myles Jack.


I bet Bill Hoodie would have Jack on the field. I bet most coaches would have Jack on the field.

---

Unfortunately the Jags had to spend in FA, and when you do that you always overpay. Malik is getting pressure. People I think are spoiled by flashy DTs like Suh who are just monsters. Normally a good defensive tackles job is what Malik is doing now

---

Malik has been playing well. Edge rushers are not getting around to make the qb step up into the pocket

---

People aren't annoyed that others want change. Ideally, a message board is a place for people of similar interests to discuss a common interest. What is annoying is that some posters complain for the sake of complaining. Or others who complain about certain aspects of the team even if it is plain obvious that they have no idea what they are talking about. After this debacle of a game vs. the Chargers, here's some examples:

 

*Malik isn't disruptive enough

*Fowler isn't finishing

 

*note* Malik had several pressures vs. SD, one leading to a Fowler sack. The other Fowler sack was caused by blitz pressure (IIRC, it was Poz). 

 

Here's another gem: "linebackers are linebackers. There's no difference. Just play them."

 

Are defensive backs just defensive backs too? How about defensive tackles?

 

There's been a few others as well.

 

Everyone has a right to complain. But if you want to have an actual discussion, bring legitimate points to the table. As it is, this board very often becomes nothing more than a sounding board for complaints rather than an avenue for debate and discussion.

 

This is why I don't share as much anymore.

 

Very few conversations to be had.  Most are just gripes, and any attempt to discuss and that poster becomes the next target to release the anger on.

 

Kick the dog mentality.

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

Lol at the attempt for an excuse as to why this coaching staff isn't playing Myles Jack.


I bet Bill Hoodie would have Jack on the field. I bet most coaches would have Jack on the field.

 

You have to find a way.

 

Seems like he's a "process" person, and rigidly so.

 

There's nothing wrong with being a process person as long as you close the loop.  If your feedback/servo mechanism is broken, then you aren't continuously improving the process.  You're just being repetitive, and leaving out one of the most important elements in the process.

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

Someday you will all recognize that this team, even 3 years ago, was worse with Bradley than they would've been with someone else.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Someday you will all recognize that this team, even 3 years ago, was worse with Bradley than they would've been with someone else.

Pretty sure 80% of jags fans realize this

---

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>

Pretty sure 80% of jags fans realize this

 

Agree, though there was nothing to suggest that three years ago.

 

Then, it was a forward thinking hire, trying to tap an up and coming coach.  To guess back then that we would be where we are now, would be just that - a very blind guess.

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

Pretty sure 80% of jags fans realize this

The other 20% are here saying Malik Jackson is a problem.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Agree, though there was nothing to suggest that three years ago.

 

Then, it was a forward thinking hire, trying to tap an up and coming coach.  To guess back then that we would be where we are now, would be just that - a very blind guess.

 

a lot of us knew he's a joke as early as year 2.

 

year 1, you're right - nobody knew he'd be this terrible

---

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>

You have to find a way.


Seems like he's a "process" person, and rigidly so.


There's nothing wrong with being a process person as long as you close the loop. If your feedback/servo mechanism is broken, then you aren't continuously improving the process. You're just being repetitive, and leaving out one of the most important elements in the process.

I would agree.

---

He hasnt hit double digit sacks yet?


Yeah he just came for the check its confirmed

---

He ain't the problem.

---