Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Trumps " Locker Room Banter"


Quote:No its not my argument.
 

Well it sounds like it...  So what's your point, exactly?

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:Well it sounds like it... So what's your point, exactly?


How so TAM? My point is that the fact he said "let's" doesn't mean anything. As has been discussed at length.
Reply


Quote:Except that's not what happened. You made up an argument based on a post from Bunnie which you didn't/couldn't understand. Then refused to admit fault and made a show out of yourself.



Using Trumps "lets" quote is related to the discussion a few pages previous about Trumps "lets" quote wether you like it or not.


Its interesting that you use sexuality and erotic concepts in debate and argument. Projecting your own insecurities into the public domain is admirable Kotite.


So your repetitive use of my handle isn't a latent masturbatory fixation? When you quote me, I know who you're talking to. Do you sometimes write our names together over and over in different combinations on pieces of scrap paper?


Cool story bro, but you still aren't providing any connection to the comment you chimed in on and the argument I abandoned. I'd say it's nice to know I live rent free in your head, but it's actually kinda creepy at this point.
Only a chump boos the home team!
Reply

(This post was last modified: 10-13-2016, 09:45 PM by The_Anchorman.)

Quote:How so TAM? My point is that the fact he said "let's" doesn't mean anything. As has been discussed at length.
 

When you are a star, they let you do anything.  

 

He didn't say "let's".  He said that because of his fame, power, and social status he can get away with sexual assault.  

 

The definition of "let" does not change that.  The fact that we're still fighting this stupid game define the word "let" is sad.  And it's a losing argument for the trumpette.  

 

If that's your argument, fine.  But you should not act smug when discussing it with other posters like Kotite.


Reply


Quote:So your repetitive use of my handle isn't a latent masturbatory fixation? When you quote me, I know who you're talking to. Do you sometimes write our names together over and over in different combinations on pieces of scrap paper?


Cool story bro, but you still aren't providing any connection to the comment you chimed in on and the argument I abandoned. I'd say it's nice to know I live rent free in your head, but it's actually kinda creepy at this point.


This new debate style of attempted degradation is interesting but you don't really have the wit or charisma to pull it off. Good on you for trying to switch things up though.


The only connection is the use of "let's". As I have said. You say they are completely unrelated, even though they use the same quote, about the same topic in the same thread about the same person.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:This new debate style of attempted degradation is interesting but you don't really have the wit or charisma to pull it off. Good on you for trying to switch things up though.


The only connection is the use of "let's". As I have said. You say they are completely unrelated, even though they use the same quote, about the same topic in the same thread about the same person.


Using something someone said as supportive evidence an alleged incident may have taken place IS NOT THE SAME THING AS taking one side of a story and assuming it to be factual without getting any other details of an event.


But feel free to keep embarrassing yourself. I will "let" you.
Only a chump boos the home team!
Reply

(This post was last modified: 10-13-2016, 10:06 PM by JackCity.)

Quote:Using something someone said as supportive evidence an alleged incident may have taken place IS NOT THE SAME THING AS taking one side of a story and assuming it to be factual without getting any other details of an event.


But feel free to keep embarrassing yourself. I will "let" you.


No they are not the same thing. Using the quote "lets" is related to the discussion we had a few pages ago though yes or no?
Reply


Quote:Using something someone said as supportive evidence an alleged incident may have taken place IS NOT THE SAME THING AS taking one side of a story and assuming it to be factual without getting any other details of an event.


But feel free to keep embarrassing yourself. I will "let" you.
 

LOL  This thread is seriously off the hook!

Reply


Quote:No they are not the same thing. Using the quote "lets" is related to the discussion we had a few pages ago though yes or no?


If you are now insinuating the connection you are trying to make is that I used quotation marks in my post, I am going to have to insist you finish this argument with the poster of me you have over your bed.


As you correctly point out, they are not the same thing. And nobody but you is making whatever connection you are making to the prior debate in this thread.
Only a chump boos the home team!
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:LOL  This thread is seriously off the hook!
It depends on what your definition of the word "let" is...

Reply


Quote:If you are now insinuating the connection you are trying to make is that I used quotation marks in my post, I am going to have to insist you finish this argument with the poster of me you have over your bed.


As you correctly point out, they are not the same thing. And nobody but you is making whatever connection you are making to the prior debate in this thread.


Again you don't have the wit to pull off the style you are trying.


So you refute the fact that the post about Trumps incident where you use the "lets" quote has absolutely no relevance to discussion earlier despite using the same quote, same person, same topic and in the same thread.


Are we already into your semantics argument?
Reply

(This post was last modified: 10-14-2016, 12:32 PM by Kotite.)

Quote:Again you don't have the wit to pull off the style you are trying.


So you refute the fact that the post about Trumps incident where you use the "lets" quote has absolutely no relevance to discussion earlier despite using the same quote, same person, same topic and in the same thread.


Are we already into your semantics argument?
C'mon Elsa.. "Let" it go already..


You just admitted these are not the same things two posts ago and then make a case connecting the two posts because of [BLEEP] quotation marks.


As for wit.. like me, love me or hate me.. I'm one of the wittiest posters on this board.. fact.


That's just something else you're wrong about.
Only a chump boos the home team!
Reply


Quote:C'mon Elsa.. "Let" it go already..


You just admitted these are not the same things two posts ago and then make a case connecting the two posts because of [BAD WORD REMOVED] quotation marks.


As for wit.. like me, love me or hate me.. I'm one of the wittiest posters on this board.. fact.


That's just something else you're wrong about.


Things can be different but still be related. For instance a bird is different to a dragonfly, but they are related somewhat by their ability to fly.


Whilst the two issues are different, they are related by both Trump and the quote used yes or no?
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Cyanide and bleach are related as your insistence on continuing this dialogue makes me want to ingest both.
Only a chump boos the home team!
Reply


Quote:Things can be different but still be related. For instance a bird is different to a dragonfly, but they are related somewhat by their ability to fly.


Whilst the two issues are different, they are related by both Trump and the quote used yes or no?


Y'all should DM this.


So far off topic!
Reply


Quote:Cyanide and bleach are related as your insistence on continuing this dialogue makes me want to ingest both.


Don't let me stop you, do you have an answer yes or no?
Reply


Yes.. You are embarrassing yourself continuing to go down this rabbit hole after you already admitted they are unrelated.


No.. for the last time.. I will not go to prom with you.. You are a stage five clinger and your obsession is beyond unhealthy.
Only a chump boos the home team!
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:Yes.. You are embarrassing yourself continuing to go down this rabbit hole after you already admitted they are unrelated.


No.. for the last time.. I will not go to prom with you.. You are a stage five clinger and your obsession is beyond unhealthy.


Nope I said they are different but related. The two are not mutually exclusive. But you already know that.


Ah yes the famous Kotite wit. As cutting as it is creative. Put some poison into it man, my kid throws harder shots.
Reply

(This post was last modified: 10-14-2016, 02:48 PM by Kotite.)

Quote:Nope I said they are different but related. The two are not mutually exclusive. But you already know that.


Ah yes the famous Kotite wit. As cutting as it is creative. Put some poison into it man, my kid throws harder shots.
You're making yourself look bad without any additional help needed from me. You just begged for me to give it to you harder for crying out loud. That's not creepy at all.
Only a chump boos the home team!
Reply


Quote:You're making yourself look bad without any additional help needed from me. You just begged for me to give it to you harder for crying out loud. That's not creepy at all.


Still no answer. I thought you gave up on the sexual projection when I pointed out how odd it is you link frustration and debate with sexaulity.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!