Login

Markulous · 12-19-2013, 09:37 PM

Too early to tell, but it all depends on how these QB prospects get graded out. If Bridgewater is the real deal and they don't think there are many other good QB prospects, then they have to draft him. If he's not, then maybe Clowney. They probably try to trade back at that point, though.

SuperJville · 12-19-2013, 09:54 PM

If I were the Rams, I wouldn't trade back. There's some real good, I mean real good players to be had in the top 5 this year.

Fred Jones-Brunell · 12-20-2013, 02:46 AM

Doesn't Jeff Fisher normally trade back? I could see the Rams staying put with their two first rounders unless they get another Redskins type offer. Use their first pick to take Matthews and the next for Watkins. I think they wait a year or two until they give up on Bradford. The Rams strike me as a team that is close to being a great team. Take the best lineman available and then the best WR and they have potential for playoffs

"Expect for the best. Prepare for the worst. Capitalize on what comes."

Fred Jones-Brunell · 12-20-2013, 02:47 AM

Doesn't Jeff Fisher normally trade back? I could see the Rams staying put with their two first rounders unless they get another Redskins type offer. Use their first pick to take Matthews and the next for Watkins. I think they wait a year or two until they give up on Bradford. The Rams strike me as a team that is close to being a great team. Take the best lineman available and then the best WR and they have potential for playoffs

"Expect for the best. Prepare for the worst. Capitalize on what comes."

flgatorsandjags · 12-20-2013, 03:41 AM

Quote:Doesn't Jeff Fisher normally trade back? I could see the Rams staying put with their two first rounders unless they get another Redskins type offer. Use their first pick to take Matthews and the next for Watkins. I think they wait a year or two until they give up on Bradford. The Rams strike me as a team that is close to being a great team. Take the best lineman available and then the best WR and they have potential for playoffs

I agree, with Matthews and Evans they would be nasty

~~JaguarsWoman~~ · 12-20-2013, 04:06 AM

Quote:4-12 is worse than 4-11-1

I must have been tired when I said 4-11-1 is worse.

It is worse than 5-11, my prediction for Jacksonville's final record, so we still need the Vikings to win one of their last two games.

Dockerill91 · 12-20-2013, 04:08 AM

Quote:I agree, with Matthews and Evans they would be nasty

I think Watkins would be a better fit for them, having a WR being able to consistently stretch the field will open up plays for tavon austin.

~~JaguarsWoman~~ · 12-20-2013, 04:13 AM

Quote:JW, please never change. You're great.

LOL I felt like an idiot after realizing later 4-12 is worse than 4-11-1.

You don't have to worry about me changing. I believe in sticking with what works and stopped rooting for the 49ers because they became the worst team by not doing that. If it's not broke, don't fix it.

~~JaguarsWoman~~ · 12-20-2013, 04:21 AM

Quote:Doesn't Jeff Fisher normally trade back? I could see the Rams staying put with their two first rounders unless they get another Redskins type offer. Use their first pick to take Matthews and the next for Watkins. I think they wait a year or two until they give up on Bradford. The Rams strike me as a team that is close to being a great team. Take the best lineman available and then the best WR and they have potential for playoffs.

Isn't Jeff Fisher just a coach who gives input on which players he likes? That is what he was at Tennessee.

I don't know about "usually" trading down. It is only his second or third season with the Rams, who were not seeking a trade when the Redskins called about their #2 pick.