Oh wow thanks. This is such good news.

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming'>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming</a>


Please update the link with your findings. Be sure to document your sources. Thanks again

---

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="oface5446" data-cid="911187" data-time="1481287710">
Oh wow thanks. This is such good news.

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming'>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming</a>


Please update the link with your findings. Be sure to document your sources. Thanks again

</blockquote>


What happened? Cat got your tongue? Come on man! Spread the good news Your findings are amazing. I can't believe you know better than the real professionals - do you mind I ask how you did it?? Astounding stuff, really.

---

I think there are a lot of nutcase leftists who don't understand the sun decides our fate.

 

Here's a little hint in case you've never thought of it before:

 

The sun will destroy the Earth one day.  Taking every single living thing with it.

 

You cannot change that.  You cannot affect that.

 

The planet, including everything living on it - animal, plant or otherwise... will be destroyed.

 

The sun will not fuel itself forever.  It will burn out.

 

That's the long term truth.

 

The short term truth is that the sun, and the sun alone, is our thermostat.

 

As it goes, we go.  Currently we are cooling as the sun is going through a phase in it's life that is currently causing the planet to cool.

 

In case you didn't notice, nutcase leftists, this is what causes temperatures to cool at night and warm again during the day.

 

Mother nature and common sense say "Hi!"

 

And that, as they say, is science.

 

https://astronomynow.com/2015/07/17/dimi...e-by-2030/

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

I think there are a lot of nutcase leftists who don't understand the sun decides our fate.


Here's a little hint in case you've never thought of it before:


The sun will destroy the Earth one day. Taking every single living thing with it.


You cannot change that. You cannot affect that.


The planet, including everything living on it - animal, plant or otherwise... will be destroyed.


The sun will not fuel itself forever. It will burn out.


That's the long term truth.


The short term truth is that the sun, and the sun alone, is our thermostat.


As it goes, we go. Currently we are cooling as the sun is going through a phase in it's life that is currently causing the planet to cool.


In case you didn't notice, nutcase leftists, this is what causes temperatures to cool at night and warm again during the day.


Mother nature and common sense say "Hi!"


And that, as they say, is science.

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://astronomynow.com/2015/07/17/diminishing-solar-activity-may-bring-new-ice-age-by-2030/'>https://astronomynow.com/2015/07/17/diminishing-solar-activity-may-bring-new-ice-age-by-2030/</a>

I'm aware the nothing lasts forever.


Read this if you are actually interested in solar activity.

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle'>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle</a>


The relevant part from the link:


"The current scientific consensus, most specifically that of the IPCC, is that solar variations do play a smaller role in driving global warming, since the measured magnitude of recent solar variation is much smaller than the forcing due to greenhouse gases. Also, solar activity in the 2010s was not higher than in the 1950s, whereas global warming had risen markedly. Otherwise, the level of understanding of solar impacts on weather is low."

---

I'm aware the nothing lasts forever.

Read this if you are actually interested in solar activity. <a class="bbc_url" href='https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle'>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle</a>

The relevant part from the link:

"The current scientific consensus, most specifically that of the IPCC, is that solar variations do play a smaller role in driving global warming, since the measured magnitude of recent solar variation is much smaller than the forcing due to greenhouse gases. Also, solar activity in the 2010s was not higher than in the 1950s, whereas global warming had risen markedly. Otherwise, the level of understanding of solar impacts on weather is low."

We don't know but everybody panic!


Great idea.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Oh good you found "one of the good ones". Let me know when the rest of the scientific community gets on board. Continue to interpret things all you want. That's the best part about science. Science doesn't care what you think.


Oil money is a lie created by the left?
<a class="bbc_url" href='https://lmgtfy.com/?q=oil+money+in+climate+denial'>https://lmgtfy.com/?q=oil+money+in+climate+denial</a>


We get it. Everything you disagree with is fake and a lie. It's probably why the majority of the planet laughs at you but keep on fighting that fight.

Did you even read the freakin link? There's a post "to be or not to be a climate heretic" or something to that effect that talked about three scientists, two of who believed climate is changing but disagreed on the scope and influence of man. There is nothing wrong with disagreeing with "experts". Healthy discourse and dissent should be encouraged. As the article said, experts believed the food pyramid. They believed we were in a global cooling. They've told us eggs are bad for you, then good for you, then bad for you, then good for you. They're finding now that unsaturated fat and cholesterol are actually not the devil like we though twenty years ago. Experts believed the earth was flat. I can go on and on. There's actually been information that's come out that many peer reviewed articles are often faulty with flaws and can't be replicated. Just because you're an "expert" doesn't mean you can't be wrong. Nor because you're not a professor at MIT doesn't mean you can take a reasonable look at the data and arrive at different conclusions.

---

Did you even read the freakin link? There's a post "to be or not to be a climate heretic" or something to that effect that talked about three scientists, two of who believed climate is changing but disagreed on the scope and influence of man. There is nothing wrong with disagreeing with "experts". Healthy discourse and dissent should be encouraged. As the article said, experts believed the food pyramid. They believed we were in a global cooling. They've told us eggs are bad for you, then good for you, then bad for you, then good for you. They're finding now that unsaturated fat and cholesterol are actually not the devil like we though twenty years ago. Experts believed the earth was flat. I can go on and on. There's actually been information that's come out that many peer reviewed articles are often faulty with flaws and can't be replicated. Just because you're an "expert" doesn't mean you can't be wrong. Nor because you're not a professor at MIT doesn't mean you can take a reasonable look at the data and arrive at different conclusions.

Experts can be wrong. But you will never prove the scientific method wrong.

---

 But you will never prove the scientific method wrong.

I will say that if this is true then the word settled science would never be used again, in climate change talk or any other form. One of the most key tenants of the scientific method is to always be a skeptic. Climate skeptic or climate denier would be a badge of honor and not a cheap label to try to smear the target instead of have any true intellectual debate. 

---

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN1421V0


Wow. All I can say is just...wow

---

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN1421V0'>http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN1421V0</a>


Wow. All I can say is just...wow

Lol, they gone get fired.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Lol, they gone get fired.

That's the idea. Ignorance is strength afterall.

---

That's the idea. Ignorance is strength afterall.

Insubordination is a terminable offense. Not very smart.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/...73291.html


Proud. To be. A murricann


Where the least I know I'm free

---

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/scientists-copy-climate-change-data-vanish-trump-president-a7473291.html'>http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/scientists-copy-climate-change-data-vanish-trump-president-a7473291.html</a>

Proud. To be. A murricann

Where the least I know I'm free

Why bother? They just "adjust" the numbers and models to achieve the desired outcomes anyway, no need for all this Kabuki Theatre.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/...ct-science

---

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2016/dec/16/this-is-not-normal-climate-researchers-take-to-the-streets-to-protect-science'>https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2016/dec/16/this-is-not-normal-climate-researchers-take-to-the-streets-to-protect-science</a>

"SAVE OUR GRANTS!"


"HEYHEYHOHO PEER REVIEW HAS GOT TO GO"


"OUR STATISTICS, OUR CHOICE!!!"

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2016/dec/16/this-is-not-normal-climate-researchers-take-to-the-streets-to-protect-science'>https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2016/dec/16/this-is-not-normal-climate-researchers-take-to-the-streets-to-protect-science</a>

"We stand tall!"

---

https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...der-trump/


Lol trump is gonna have to build two walls now

---

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/canadian-scientists-warn-u-s-colleagues-act-now-to-protect-science-under-trump/'>https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/canadian-scientists-warn-u-s-colleagues-act-now-to-protect-science-under-trump/</a>

Lol trump is gonna have to build two walls now

Good to see their political assumptions are as worthless as their religio-scientific ones.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Good to see their political assumptions are as worthless as their religio-scientific ones.

You are just making words up now.

---