http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/a...mailonline

 

<p class="" style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10px;">NOAA’s 2015 ‘Pausebuster’ paper was based on two new temperature sets of data – one containing measurements of temperatures at the planet’s surface on land, the other at the surface of the seas.

<p class="" style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10px;"> 

<p class="" style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10px;">Both datasets were flawed. This newspaper has learnt that NOAA has now decided that the sea dataset will have to be replaced and substantially revised just 18 months after it was issued, because it used unreliable methods which overstated the speed of warming. The revised data will show both lower temperatures and a slower rate in the recent warming trend.

 

 

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

NASA and NOAA presenting alternative facts.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

Shur didn't I hang the clothes out to dry today, last year it was raining on this very day and I got no drying done at all. Global warming I tells yaaa!!

---

The fact that the last two years have been the warmest in recorded history tells me something is happening. This planet has seen plenty of cycles of weather patterns over the millennia but to say that we don't play a part in it is plain foolish. You can't dump the amount of chemicals, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, poisons, waste, etc., onto the planet and expect it to not to incur damage. If that were the case we wouldn't have regulations on pollution of air, land and water. The stuff doesn't just damage us, it damages the planet as well. 

 

Is there global warming? I have no clue, but there is climate change. Always has been and always will be.

---

Fake news.


http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/n...on-sunday/


This should be obvious to anyone paying attention. When the only folks carrying the 'story' are The Daily Mail, Daily Caller, Breitbart, Redhot News, etc this should clue you in that this is fake news. But this is the echo chamber you enjoy. So it goes. Nothing new here.

---

Fake news.

http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/n...on-sunday/


This should be obvious to anyone paying attention. When the only folks carrying the 'story' are The Daily Mail, Daily Caller, Breitbart, Redhot News, etc this should clue you in that this is fake news. But this is the echo chamber you enjoy. So it goes. Nothing new here.

 

How DARE they expose our fraud! How. Dare. They!

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

"Hottest on record?"

 

The scientists don't even know, but they sure are manipulating perception to make folks believe so.  Even against what the data is telling them.

 

http://thefederalist.com/2017/01/18/nyt-...ar-record/

 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/...1feaad23c6

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

Fake news.

http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/n...on-sunday/


This should be obvious to anyone paying attention. When the only folks carrying the 'story' are The Daily Mail, Daily Caller, Breitbart, Redhot News, etc this should clue you in that this is fake news. But this is the echo chamber you enjoy. So it goes. Nothing new here.

 

well lets just hope to Allah that we start paying carbon taxes soon, because without it we gonna die man.

---

Fake news.

http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/n...on-sunday/


This should be obvious to anyone paying attention. When the only folks carrying the 'story' are The Daily Mail, Daily Caller, Breitbart, Redhot News, etc this should clue you in that this is fake news. But this is the echo chamber you enjoy. So it goes. Nothing new here.

 

I don't understand. If your link is fake news, why even post it?

---

                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"

We have the Department of Defense saying climate change is a real threat.


We have thousands of American scientists saying it's a threat.


We have scientists in Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia saying it's a threat.



But good ole Conservative conspiracy theorists want to tell everyone they are all wrong because they know better. Nah.

---

We have the Department of Defense saying climate change is a real threat.


We have thousands of American scientists saying it's a threat.


We have scientists in Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia saying it's a threat.



But good ole Conservative conspiracy theorists want to tell everyone they are all wrong because they know better. Nah.

 

History is filled with similar false alarms.

 

You're just showing your inexperience and lack of knowledge of history.

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/1970...age-scare/

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

If you feel stupid, that's ok.  You were fooled.  Shame on them, not you.

 

Unless you continue down a fruitless path having known better now.

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

If you feel stupid, that's ok. You were fooled. Shame on them, not you.


Unless you continue down a fruitless path having known better now.

Feel bad for ya bruh

---

Feel bad for ya bruh

 

Keep your head up your butt and keep telling yourself it's night time.

 

If you choose ignorance, it's no excuse for not knowing better.

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

Keep your head up your butt and keep telling yourself it's night time.


If you choose ignorance, it's no excuse for not knowing better.

Did you really make a 91% avatar? I'm flattered since I'm the one who created that thread before a ban.


What expert knowledge do you have to refute the growing body of evidence in favor of anthropogenic climate change?

---

Keep your head up your butt and keep telling yourself it's night time.


If you choose ignorance, it's no excuse for not knowing better.

Projection - the last resort of the ego when confronted with a reality it cannot accept

---

We have the Department of Defense saying climate change is a real threat.


We have thousands of American scientists saying it's a threat.


We have scientists in Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia saying it's a threat.



But good ole Conservative conspiracy theorists want to tell everyone they are all wrong because they know better. Nah.

 

Are you finally ready to comment as a scientist on the NASA lie about accelerated sea level rise?

---

                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"

Are you finally ready to comment as a scientist on the NASA lie about accelerated sea level rise?

 

Sea levels are rising. It is not a lie. 

 

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v53...17145.html

 

Polar temperatures over the last several million years have, at times, been slightly warmer than today, yet global mean sea level has been 6–9 metres higher as recently as the Last Interglacial (130,000 to 115,000 years ago) and possibly higher during the Pliocene epoch (about three million years ago). In both cases the Antarctic ice sheet has been implicated as the primary contributor, hinting at its future vulnerability. Here we use a model coupling ice sheet and climate dynamics—including previously underappreciated processes linking atmospheric warming with hydrofracturing of buttressing ice shelves and structural collapse of marine-terminating ice cliffs—that is calibrated against Pliocene and Last Interglacial sea-level estimates and applied to future greenhouse gas emission scenarios. Antarctica has the potential to contribute more than a metre of sea-level rise by 2100 and more than 15 metres by 2500, if emissions continue unabated. In this case atmospheric warming will soon become the dominant driver of ice loss, but prolonged ocean warming will delay its recovery for thousands of years.

 

Here is the NSF grant that funded the study: 

 

https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAwar...ID=1202632

---

Did you really make a 91% avatar? I'm flattered since I'm the one who created that thread before a ban.

What expert knowledge do you have to refute the growing body of evidence in favor of anthropogenic climate change?

Liar

---

What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.