What makes somebody a fake scientist? Are using a trump buzzword?


You really are scarily easy to control.

Bill Nye isn't a scientist and his "name" implies he is, so yes, I'll gladly use the word fake here.

---

Bill Nye isn't a scientist and his "name" implies he is, so yes, I'll gladly use the word fake here.

 

I would consider Bill Nye a science educator. He isn't technically a scientist (he is an engineer by training) but he's well versed in a varienty of science fields.

 

I'm called a fake scientist when I conduct actual research, write proposals, write grants, develop research strategies, conduct hypothesis testing, and submit and publish research. But, if your "science" doesn't agree with conservative idealogy you are deemed fake. I think people need to take politics out of it and understand the actual science. I wouldn't get my information from a blog. 

 

I guess HandsomeRob66 is a also a fake public health professional.

 

Who else is fake in here?

---

I would consider Bill Nye a science educator. He isn't technically a scientist (he is an engineer by training) but he's well versed in a varienty of science fields.

 

I'm called a fake scientist when I conduct actual research, write proposals, write grants, develop research strategies, conduct hypothesis testing, and submit and publish research. But, if your "science" doesn't agree with conservative idealogy you are deemed fake. I think people need to take politics out of it and understand the actual science. I wouldn't get my information from a blog. 

 

I guess HandsomeRob66 is a also a fake public health professional.

 

Who else is fake in here?

 

I can't take politics out of it when Nye goes on a political show to try to spew his verbal sewage. Also, his recent collaboration with that geriatric Bernie Sanders shows he isn't really in it for the right reasons anyway.

---

I can't take politics out of it when Nye goes on a political show to try to spew his verbal sewage. Also, his recent collaboration with that geriatric Bernie Sanders shows he isn't really in it for the right reasons anyway.

Well fine. Here are the facts.


The majority of the worlds leading scientist believe climate change is real and that humans are behind its acceleration.


Conservatives either deny or down play Climate Change as they do with most environmental issues.


Progressives accept the science and believe it should be used to inform policy decisions, while Conservatives do not.


Do you not see this dichotomy? Can you name one issue whether it was clean water, clear air, smog, fracking, CFCs, green energy, etc etc where conservatives have been leaders?

---

Well fine. Here are the facts.


The majority of the worlds leading scientist believe climate change is real and that humans are behind its acceleration.


Conservatives either deny or down play Climate Change as they do with most environmental issues.


Progressives accept the science and believe it should be used to inform policy decisions, while Conservatives do not.


Do you not see this dichotomy? Can you name one issue whether it was clean water, clear air, smog, fracking, CFCs, green energy, etc etc where conservatives have been leaders?

 

Lets just assume climate change is real. How do you even begin to fix it? It's a GLOBAL issue, not an individual. Nothing will be done until there is a catastrophic global event that can be directly tied to global warming. In the meantime, it is just a waste of time and there are way bigger fish to fry.

---

Lets just assume climate change is real. How do you even begin to fix it? It's a GLOBAL issue, not an individual. Nothing will be done until there is a catastrophic global event that can be directly tied to global warming. In the meantime, it is just a waste of time and there are way bigger fish to fry.

Well you can't fix it like you would a flat tire. You find long term solutions to moving away from fossil fuels which are not good for the environment any way (see China). Research and develop the technologies to do get cleaner energy. Find the best practical solutions. And adapt. Our generation won't be the one that will have to deal with the more severe effects of climate change. It will be our children's children and then their children.

---

Well fine. Here are the facts.


The majority of the worlds leading scientist believe climate change is real and that humans are behind its acceleration.


Conservatives either deny or down play Climate Change as they do with most environmental issues.


Progressives accept the science and believe it should be used to inform policy decisions, while Conservatives do not.


Do you not see this dichotomy? Can you name one issue whether it was clean water, clear air, smog, fracking, CFCs, green energy, etc etc where conservatives have been leaders?

 

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

I would consider Bill Nye a science educator. He isn't technically a scientist (he is an engineer by training) but he's well versed in a varienty of science fields.


I'm called a fake scientist when I conduct actual research, write proposals, write grants, develop research strategies, conduct hypothesis testing, and submit and publish research. But, if your "science" doesn't agree with conservative idealogy you are deemed fake. I think people need to take politics out of it and understand the actual science. I wouldn't get my information from a blog.


I guess HandsomeRob66 is a also a fake public health professional.


Who else is fake in here?

Trump would consider me a fake accountant If my numbers weren't a positive reflection on him.

---

Trump would consider me a fake accountant If my numbers weren't a positive reflection on him.

If you didn't have your CPA, a lot of people would consider you a fake accountant.

---

 

 

That's a big.... Nvm... Too easy..

---

Fake scientists disagree. A couple of them are posting on this very thread.

---

What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.







 

Well played, sir!

---

<p class="bbc_left">Education is the cheap defense of nations. - Edmund Burke

<p class="bbc_left"> 

<p class="bbc_left">Or is it from Burke? I tried finding the source, and looked through some of his writings, no luck. Anybody with google-fu got a citation of the source?

 

I am well aware Nixon created the EPA. In fact I applaud him for that act but when was the last time protecting the environment was part of a Conservative platform? I'll wait. 

---

I am well aware Nixon created the EPA. In fact I applaud him for that act but when was the last time protecting the environment was part of a Conservative platform? I'll wait.

Depends on what you mean by protecting.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

I would consider Bill Nye a science educator. He isn't technically a scientist (he is an engineer by training) but he's well versed in a varienty of science fields.

 

 

Well versed = agrees with me. 

---

Calling Deshawn Watson a future bust since 3/19/17. If I eat crow, I will keep this in here and proclaim JackCity a genius. 

Well fine. Here are the facts.


The majority of the worlds leading scientist believe climate change is real and that humans are behind its acceleration.


Conservatives either deny or down play Climate Change as they do with most environmental issues.


Progressives accept the science and believe it should be used to inform policy decisions, while Conservatives do not.


Do you not see this dichotomy? Can you name one issue whether it was clean water, clear air, smog, fracking, CFCs, green energy, etc etc where conservatives have been leaders?

 

1. How do you know a "majority" of the "world's leading scientists" believe climate change catastrophic anthropogenic global warming is real and that humans are behind it's acceleration? 
(odd claim, since there is no "acceleration") I can show you a petition that lists over 31,000 scientists who disagree with that premise. Can you show us a list that has even 1,000 scientists who believe what you say? Or do you just limit "world's leading scientists" to those who agree with you?

 

2. Many Conservatives accept that the planet is warming and that CO2 plays a role. What Conservatives downplay is the ability of huge wasteful spending and crippling regulations to have any significant effect on global temperature.


 

3. I agree. Massively expensive policy decisions that don't work are the specialty of Progressives.


 

4. Conservatives support clean air and water. You need to read something other than Daily Kos.

---

                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"

1. How do you know a "majority" of the "world's leading scientists" believe <del>climate change</del> catastrophic anthropogenic global warming is real and that humans are behind it's acceleration?
(odd claim, since there is no "acceleration") I can show you a petition that lists over 31,000 scientists who disagree with that premise. Can you show us a list that has even 1,000 scientists who believe what you say? Or do you just limit "world's leading scientists" to those who agree with you?

2. Many Conservatives accept that the planet is warming and that CO2 plays a role. What Conservatives downplay is the ability of huge wasteful spending and crippling regulations to have any significant effect on global temperature.


3. I agree. Massively expensive policy decisions that don't work are the specialty of Progressives.


4. Conservatives support clean air and water. You need to read something other than Daily Kos.

Lol still trotting out the 31k online petition that Mickey Mouse signed.


I don't mind stupid. Ignorance is a problem. Willful ignorance is a pyschological problem which is a whole other level. But intellectual dishonesty is pretty darn pathetic.


Anyhow, I wonder do they pay you with American or Russian money?

---

Lets just assume climate change is real. How do you even begin to fix it? It's a GLOBAL issue, not an individual. Nothing will be done until there is a catastrophic global event that can be directly tied to global warming. In the meantime, it is just a waste of time and there are way bigger fish to fry.

One Volcanic eruption under the right circumstances will send the Earth into another ice age. Only a liberal or a fake scientist would think people are so significant as to change something on a scale that they don't even comprehend.

 

The majority of them keep propagating this silliness for the $$$$$. Silly, loony liberals. 

---

What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.







 

Well you can't fix it like you would a flat tire. You find long term solutions to moving away from fossil fuels which are not good for the environment any way (see China). Research and develop the technologies to do get cleaner energy. Find the best practical solutions. And adapt. Our generation won't be the one that will have to deal with the more severe effects of climate change. It will be our children's children and then their children.

 

Unsustainable government is a bigger threat to our children, their children, and theirs.

 

Not the lies of fake climate "science."

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

Lol still trotting out the 31k online petition that Mickey Mouse signed.


I don't mind stupid. Ignorance is a problem. Willful ignorance is a pyschological problem which is a whole other level. But intellectual dishonesty is pretty darn pathetic.


Anyhow, I wonder do they pay you with American or Russian money?

 

By all means, show us where Mickey Mouse signed it. Or admit you lied.


 

There are over 31,000 names. Subtract out all of the garbage every petition has and there are still over 31,000 names of actual scientists. Most of them are real scientists who don't adjust the data to get the answer they want.


 

And I'm sorry about your willful ignorance. You should study the subject instead of just parroting what the Guardian politicos spout.

---

                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"