Scenario 8:

1: Fournette

2: G/T

3: TE

4: G/T

---

Calling Deshawn Watson a future bust since 3/19/17. If I eat crow, I will keep this in here and proclaim JackCity a genius. 

Scenario 8:

1: Fournette

2: G/T

3: TE

4: G/T

Fail no QB.

---

Bleeding Teal since 1995. The Icon Teal Time Radio aka ctjags

  #Gojags

Wouldn't be a thread unless Teal Time posts multiple times about Watson.

---

I had a feeling you'd go for the one with Foreman at round 2!

 

 

I didn't even base it off of that. I just want a plug and play O-Linemen. I want an elite player on the O-Line, because there is no sense in drafting a RB high, unless we add more run blockers. What we currently have is not gonna help us. 

---

1

 

I vote for 1 in the original post. 

 

My thinking is, no matter the combination of picks, I would like to see an offensive lineman picked with our 2nd round pick, and if not, then our 3rd round pick at the latest.   We have to come out of this draft with a starting offensive lineman.  I wouldn't spend #4 on an offensive lineman.  

 

So here's what I would do: 

 

Round 1) best available player

Round 2) offensive line

Round 3) best available player

 

I think our current RBs are average.  I don't see any need to add another average RB, which is probably what we would get in round 3 or later.   I think an average offensive lineman would improve our running game, and our offense, a lot more than an average RB. 

---

Fail no QB.

You might as well get used to seeing Bortles behind center. He will be the starter this year barring injury.

---

The Scenario where we trade down, and get an extra pick somewhere.

---

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 

1

 

I vote for 1 in the original post. 

 

My thinking is, no matter the combination of picks, I would like to see an offensive lineman picked with our 2nd round pick, and if not, then our 3rd round pick at the latest.   We have to come out of this draft with a starting offensive lineman.  I wouldn't spend #4 on an offensive lineman.  

 

So here's what I would do: 

 

Round 1) best available player

Round 2) offensive line

Round 3) best available player

 

I think our current RBs are average.  I don't see any need to add another average RB, which is probably what we would get in round 3 or later.   I think an average offensive lineman would improve our running game, and our offense, a lot more than an average RB. 

If you have Lamp as an all pro caliber guard and Thomas/Allen are gone. Would you rather take him?

---

The Scenario where we trade down, and get an extra pick somewhere.

 

I was going to say this too.

 

Saints want the replacement for Drew Brees.

 

#4 - Saints - QB of their choice

 

Jags Get 2017 #11, #32, #76 and 2018 2nd rounder

 

My Draft:

 

#11 - O.J Howard (TE)

 

#32 - F. Lamp (G)

 

#35 - A. Kamara (RB)

 

#68 - A. Garcia (OT)

 

#78 - J. Mixon (RB)

 

#110 - J. Butt (TE)

 

#148 - B. Kaaya (QB)

---

LOVE THEM JAGUARS!

Guys.....Lamp is not making to 32

---

I was going to say this too.


Saints want the replacement for Drew Brees.


#4 - Saints - QB of their choice


Jags Get 2017 #11, #32, #76 and 2018 2nd rounder

My Draft:


#11 - O.J Howard (TE)


#32 - F. Lamp (G)


#35 - A. Kamara (RB)


#68 - A. Garcia (OT)


#78 - J. Mixon (RB)


#110 - J. Butt (TE)


#148 - B. Kaaya (QB)

I'd take Sidney Jones instead of kamara if things fell that way.


That would be exquisite but I think this draft is gonna be pretty wild, so idk what's gonna be possible.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

Fail no QB.

It's Bortles this year. If he fails we draft one high next year. I know you're crazy about Watson but it isn't going to happen.

---

Calling Deshawn Watson a future bust since 3/19/17. If I eat crow, I will keep this in here and proclaim JackCity a genius. 

6. I dont mind either Thomas or Allen, probably Thomas due to concerns.

Running back would be Mixon.

---