If you aren't going to bother to do your own homework, I would suggest you listen to others instead of continuing to bringing fantasy to the "discussion."

 

It's not hard to do research.  All it takes is curiosity and the willingness to learn from others.

 

The NFL is losing money as is, even with sellouts.

 

Placing a full time team there would lose even more.

 

I don't understand how you struggle with this so mightily.

 

It's not an endeavor they are likely to find a viable financial solution for.  Ever.

 

But then, if you want to continue to overlook all the indicators that show why it's not viable, that's your prerogative.

 

What I am asking for is your proof of the highlighted. Link? Source?

*Could not find information regarding a move to London resulting in a loss of profit*

---

Men who spend billions on what boils down to hobbies for them are not concerned about profit and loss at that point. Period.

Idk that is tough. I think it would matter for them. 

---

This is a cool pic of London

 

---

Saw on Jeopardy yesterday that the tall pointed building on the left is nicknamed The Shard.

---

What I am asking for is your proof of the highlighted. Link? Source?

*Could not find information regarding a move to London resulting in a loss of profit*

 

What you're asking for is for someone else to do your homework.  Obviously, you're not interested in the truth, or you could have easily found it with Google.  There are several articles that can easily be found that cover the fact they don't make money with the London games.

 

Until they can find a way for the games to make money, placing a team there permanently isn't even a conversation.  Until then, it's merely a pipe dream.

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

Saw on Jeopardy yesterday that the tall pointed building on the left is nicknamed The Shard.

 

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

WTH is that? Is that DF's tribute statue to KPop stars?

---

Yes, it's improvement, but it's Blaine Gabbert 2012 level improvement. - Pirkster

http://youtu.be/ouGM3NWpjxk The Home Hypnotist!

http://youtu.be/XQRFkn0Ly3A Media on the Brain Link!
 

Peyton must store oxygen in that forehead of his. No way I'd still be alive after all that choking.

 

WTH is that? Is that DF's tribute statue to KPop stars?

 

That's the shard.

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

That's the shard.

The building in London?

---

The Dark Crystal. Haven't seen that movie since I was a kid.

---

This is a cool pic of London

 

 

So where does Darlo either work or live?

---

I survived the Gus Bradley Error.

What you're asking for is for someone else to do your homework.  Obviously, you're not interested in the truth, or you could have easily found it with Google.  There are several articles that can easily be found that cover the fact they don't make money with the London games.

 

Until they can find a way for the games to make money, placing a team there permanently isn't even a conversation.  Until then, it's merely a pipe dream.

*Still waiting for you to back up your suggestion that a future permanent NFL team will not be profitable in London*

---

*Still waiting for you to back up your suggestion that a future permanent NFL team will not be profitable in London*

 

I think it could be pretty profitable, I just don't think it could be a really successful winning team on the field, but off the field, yeah, absolutely it could be profitable, especially in the early years.

 

Would it be sustainable, well, are there any teams out there that are losing money right now?

---

I survived the Gus Bradley Error.

*Still waiting for you to back up your suggestion that a future permanent NFL team will not be profitable in London*

 

You're free to disprove it all you want.  Don't bother.  I won't wait.  You don't do your homework, and that you certainly have proven.

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

It looks like a shard.

---

This is a cool pic of London

Nice looking city, shame its full of the English.

---

Nice looking city, shame its full of the English.

I laughed.

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

You're free to disprove it all you want. Don't bother. I won't wait. You don't do your homework, and that you certainly have proven.

Oh, now we are judging.

You don't site your sources. That you certainly have proven. Guess you don't need credibility to be a "mod"

---

Oh, now we are judging off of a single convo.

Two can play this game....

You don't site your sources. That you certainly have proven. Guess you don't need credibility to be a "mod"

---

I love how this guy thinks I should take HIS comments without any back up. It was HIS claim, yet he is too lazy to post a source. "It's out there" or "I found it on the Internet" or "I read something once".


BTW, I've seen what this Porkster guy is talking about in articles. What Porkster fails to still prove is that a FUTURE PERMANENT NFL TEAM IN LONDON won't be profitable. His claim.


*Still waiting*

---