The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
This mock is pretty darn good
|
http://www.nfl.com/draft/2017/mock-draft...ter/340710
Forget how you feel about Fournette this 4. At face value, this draft would be very good. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Accept if Garrett goes beyond one. Then might as well go all in for Garrett. And instantly becomes one the best defenses in nfl if Myles Excels.
Bleeding Teal since 1995. The Icon Teal Time Radio aka ctjags
#Gojags Quote:Accept if Garrett goes beyond one. Then might as well go all in for Garrett. And instantly becomes one the best defenses in nfl if Myles Excels. Agreed, and I can almost see it happening. In my latest mock I have the Browns trading up to #5 for Trubisky, but instead they could just stay put and draft him at 1. If they really need a DE, they should be able to get Derek Barnett at #12. If the Browns take Tru over Garrett, I'm thinking we're looking at something like...
'02
Quote:While I would LOVE to get Garrett here, the question is given our other needs along the OL, RB and TE, would it be worth the cost to trade up to get him? Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!
Quote:While I would LOVE to get Garrett here, the question is given our other needs along the OL, RB and TE, would it be worth the cost to trade up to get him? For Garrett heck yeah. The guy is a game changer.
'02
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Looking at the charts, I'm thinking it would take our 2nd and 4th, and next year's 2nd.
This year we'd have Garrett with the first pick, and then in round three there should still be some quality OLs who can start. In round five, we could go BAP among available RBs and TEs.
'02
Quote:http://www.nfl.com/draft/2017/mock-draft...ter/340710Yea that would be an amazing draft You get one of the best RB prospects of the last 10 years, great OL in the 2nd, very good DL help, a nice CB and G, then Butt who in a few years could be the steal of the draft
<B><FONT color=cyan>Jags this is your year</FONT></B>
Really want Fournette in the 1st and Dawkins in the 2nd
<p style="text-align:center;">
![]() Quote:Really want Fournette in the 1st and Dawkins in the 2nd If we stay put I'm thinking there's a very strong possibility this is precisely what happens.
'02
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! |
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.