I'm surprised that Manziels accuracy has come up as a criticism of him. I've watched quite a few of his games in the last year, and he's always seemed accurate both in the pocket and on the move. Granted I didnt watch the game where he was injured.

 

I think the main thing to remember here is that everyone knows that Manziel will be a risk, its a question of if the reward is worth it. As previous posters have said, if he can adapt to the pro style while still keeping his intangebles he'll be an excellent QB.

 

Personally if him (or Bridgewater) are there at 3, we should pick them, irrespective of Clowney being there. Clowney is like the final piece of a jigsaw, we're currently missing most of the pieces. What is going to make this team improve more, an extra piece on defence (granted elite) who will affect 19% of the game (if I remember the stats correctly) or taking a risk on a QB (and by this I only refer to Bridgewater and Manziel, as I'm not sold on the others) who will affect half the game. Our current defence is even servicable enough to cope as it is, but obviously we will add some pieces in FA and maybe in the draft. One of the main problems last year was our offence constantly going 3 and out and the defence being on the field every 5th play.

---