(08-03-2017, 09:02 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:

(08-03-2017, 11:09 AM)rollerjag Wrote: And even easier and more common mistake is assuming the attack was both unjustified and initiated by the alleged "thug", not a reasonable response to being threatened by a gun for no legitimate reason.

Unless, of course, a survivor packing a piece has always acted in pure self defense when attacked by "thugs". In hoodies.

On topic, The Mooch is an [BLEEP] kissing opportunist. Stay tuned, he will "re-emerge". As himself.

Thuggie Fresh thought he was gonna bow up and beat down the "mother [BLEEP] cracker" and got himself popped for it. Evidence and testimony were clear, even AFTER the MSM went out of their way to paint Zim as an evil white man with a gun. Even after the forensics came out showing Martin was on top of him beating his head into the concrete. Even after their star witness perjured herself on the stand. But hey, always gotta take the criminals side, it's what the lefties do.

Again, you're equating being on top as being the initial aggressor. If someone threatens you with a gun and you believe he will shoot you, you have the right to go on the offensive. We know Martin was on top at the end, we don't know exactly how or why he got there. If the left takes the criminal side, then the right refers to the black guy in the hoodie with code phrases like "Thuggie Fresh".

---