Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
The Conundrum at WR

#19
(This post was last modified: 09-15-2017, 02:57 AM by Bullseye.)

(09-13-2017, 12:34 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: They have Lee listed #1 (X) Hurns at #2 (Z most likely) and then Benn, Cole and McCaffery

I think they use Lee and Hurns in 2 WR sets and kick Hurns inside and bring out Cole (or Benn depending on matchup)  for 3 WR sets.
You put Cole at Z if you want to stretch the field, Benn at Z if you want possession control.  

We'll have to be down on the scoreboard or failing in the run game to see 4WR sets most likely, but I'd guess Benn is your guy there until McCaffery is up to speed with the book.

http://www.jaguars.com/team/depth-chart.html

That makes a ton of sense for the interim.

But, I stick to my premise that if Cole rounds out his game this year, he'll be the #1 by season's end.

(09-15-2017, 12:45 AM)surfon Wrote: Can Hurns ever get back that sweet double move he had as a rook?

I sure hope so.

That was sweet.
 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!





Reply


Messages In This Thread
The Conundrum at WR - by Bullseye - 09-13-2017, 09:52 AM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by Browntrouser - 09-13-2017, 12:27 PM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by NCJag - 09-13-2017, 12:30 PM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by JaguarsWoman - 09-13-2017, 12:40 PM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by NCJag - 09-13-2017, 12:45 PM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by JaguarsWoman - 09-13-2017, 12:53 PM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by NYC4jags - 09-13-2017, 12:34 PM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by Bullseye - 09-15-2017, 02:56 AM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by knarnn - 09-13-2017, 12:59 PM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by Caldrac - 09-13-2017, 02:00 PM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by B2hibry - 09-13-2017, 02:02 PM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by Caldrac - 09-13-2017, 02:06 PM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by Nikowho - 09-13-2017, 03:12 PM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by archer56 - 09-13-2017, 08:07 PM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by Jay Carter 904 - 09-14-2017, 04:37 PM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by DragonFury - 09-14-2017, 04:41 PM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by flgatorsandjags - 09-14-2017, 06:30 PM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by Byron LeftTown - 09-14-2017, 04:58 PM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by surfon - 09-15-2017, 12:45 AM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by fredalwaysajag - 09-15-2017, 05:42 AM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by The Real Marty - 09-15-2017, 06:42 AM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by homebiscuit - 09-15-2017, 07:17 AM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by RicoTx - 09-15-2017, 08:13 AM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by Monty - 09-15-2017, 08:33 AM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by NYC4jags - 09-15-2017, 09:44 AM
RE: The Conundrum at WR - by JNev - 09-15-2017, 09:43 AM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!