(09-25-2017, 11:51 AM)Brett Wrote: Ok...hold up. Don't write me off just based off that. I'm not agreeing with this question...

I was listening to the Dan Patrick Show just now and he made the comment that he thinks that the Lions are better off without Calvin Johnson because it opens up the offense more and they aren't solely relying on him to bail them out. Dan Patrick said of course he believes Calvin Johnson was legitimate and was an amazing player...that was just his opinion.

So it had me thinking....could that be the same for us in regards to Allen Robinson? I'm not saying it is or isn't but in the case of Blake Bortles...could he also have been solely relying on Allen Robinson a lot in the past and now it's opening up the offense more?

Again...I am not saying I believe for sure we are better off with Allen Robinson...do not misunderstand me. Just had me thinking in regards to our team with A-Rob when I heard that quote from Dan Patrick on Calvin Johnson. Obviously Calvin Johnson is ahead of A-Rob in talent too so it might not be the case...