The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
I just gotta rattle some cages here
|
Quote:1. Didn't really matter that he was or not, I'd bet he would have won the championship had he been the starting QB all year long. He was definitely more successful than Leak. 1. Complete speculation on your part. 2. http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/tim-tebow-1.html http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/play...eak-1.html Chris Leak threw 365 passes and had 77 rushes for a minimum of 442 touches in 2006 (which doesn't count the times he handed off). Tim Tebow threw 33 passes and had 89 rushes in 2006 for a minimum of 122 easily documentable snaps. So unless Tebow actually handed the ball off, blocked, went out for passes or quick kicked another 320 times, It is highly doubtful that Tebow got the same number of snaps as Leak in 2006. Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.