Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Blake Bortles 2017, by the numbers.

#30

(10-23-2017, 09:35 AM)imtheblkranger Wrote: Bortles is quietly on his way to his best statistical start of a season. 

58.6%
1398 yards
9 TDs
5 INTs
85.4 rating

Extrapolated to 16 games is:

3200 yards
22 TDs
11 INTs

I think a lot of us would have taken those numbers all day long from Blake. His biggest issue is consistency. He'll have great games (Bal, Indy) and then terrible games (Tennessee)

That being said, he's had multiple good passes dropped, but he's not making those stupid INTs that have plagued him on years past. Missing ARob is a big blow, but hopefully Westbrook can ease that a bit. 

What we need to see from Blake is consistency. Now obviously we shouldn't expect an Indy like performance every week, but we shouldn't get a 2nd half Tennessee Bortles either. 

It will be interesting to see how the season progresses, especially since we are built well for colder weather with the run game and strong defense. Not that Jax gets cold, but still. 

Honestly, if he stays at the pace he's on right now, I could see us bringing him back in some capacity. We of course will draft a QB, but if Bortles finishes the year 2-1 on TD/INT and doesn't single handedly lose some games, be prepared for him to be back. 

It's amazing what a proper coaching staff can do.

I meant to add, by QB Rating, he's ahead of:

Mariota
Cam
Ben
Dalton

Bortles isn't as bad as most people think.  Is he "good"?  That's pretty subjective.

Looking at the stat sheet doesn't tell the whole story.  How many in-completions are from drops by receivers?  How many INT's are from balls batted into the air by receivers that fail to make a catch (I can think of two that immediately come to mind)?

The bottom line is he's not really playing bad and his stats aren't really about him.  By the same token, he is what he is.  He's no Peyton Manning or Tom Brady, he is more like the quarterback that he was often compared to (Ben Roethlisberger).  As he matures he's making better decisions.

Barring a major meltdown I suspect that he will probably be back next season, and that's not a bad thing.  Draft a QB and develop him and let Bortles manage the game.


There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Blake Bortles 2017, by the numbers. - by Kane - 10-23-2017, 09:39 AM
RE: Blake Bortles 2017, by the numbers. - by Kane - 10-23-2017, 11:05 AM
RE: Blake Bortles 2017, by the numbers. - by jagibelieve - 10-23-2017, 09:39 PM
RE: Blake Bortles 2017, by the numbers. - by Kane - 10-24-2017, 12:21 PM



Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!