(11-08-2017, 07:43 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:

(11-08-2017, 07:31 PM)ColoJag Wrote: Based on play then yes I would agree it would be Jackson and Ivory but that would have us eat 6 mil in dead space for Malik. I could see us dropping hurns because I would rather have A-rob because he is a number 1 guy where hurns is a decent 2.  For Parnell, we have to draft someone in the first and 2nd round and why not get our new RT.

Also, I keep seeing us getting named dropped as a landing spot for Cousins, how is that possible? Bortles is 20+Malik is 9 that's 29 then you need to sign ARob so that's where you cut Hurns and Ivory and we would be pretty much at the cap I would imagine

We would save 9.5 mil in cap space cutting Jackson.  Why get a new RT when Parnell is playing the best season of his career, and only making 6.5 mil. which isn't much at all for a tackle.  How do you know Brown, McGlinchey, or Williams fall to your 1st pick?  If those 3 or gone you would be forced to reach on a tackle and the right side of you line just got much weaker when you could of kept Parnell for not much at all compared to what decent starting tackles make.  I dont get that logic at all cutting Parnell as good as this oline has played and what he makes

---

(11-08-2017, 07:41 PM)knarnn Wrote: We’ll be fine. We have almost 38 million in cap rollover which isn’t accounted for on these websites. We may not have crazy spending sprees like in years pass but we will have enough to do what we need to do with our current guys and go after a top free agent if we choose to.

That wont happen because the following year we are going to have to give big money to Fowler, Yannick, Jack, and a decent contract to keep Day