About the Dede call: they were suppose to be reviewing the catch to see if he was in bounds. The fact that the refs said they couldn't determine if the receiver had possession of the ball should not have been a factor. There was never an original determination that he didn't have possession of the ball. There must be irrefutable evidence to overturn an incorrect call. In this case, there was never an original call to determine he didn't posses the ball, so there was nothing to confirm/refute in that regard

---