(11-24-2017, 12:46 PM)Caldrac Wrote: I don't. He could be another Fitzpatrick or McCown type. And you can't trust him if that's the case. It's a mistake to fork over huge amounts of money to these signal callers. Look at Chicago with Glennon this off-season. It's just not worth it. I'd rather go after a 10+ year veteran that's been with the same team forever like a Rivers, Brees or Manning over Keenum. And then you draft a successor to groom for a year or two. To me that's typically been the best method.

I agree, I think that Keenum has deviated far from the mean with his play this year, but he has also been on a better team than he has ever had before. He did look decent backing up the Texans like 5 years ago when they were a playoff squad and Schwab went down, but I still think he will come back down to earth next season. 

If I was a QB needy team and he was willing to take 12-16 million per, I might take a shot at that point. But when you get into real franchise QB money (20 mm +) I don't think you pay that to guys with less of a resume than say Cousins. 

On the other hand I think this might be a great time to pick up on Teddy Bridgewater. He would be a decent fit with a team like the Jags cause he is highly accurate (always has been) and isn't going to turn the ball over alot. Blake was never made to be a game manager and he doesn't fit in that role IMO (but he isn't good enough to win consistently as a gun slinger either). Teddy was made to be an excellent game manager. So if he would take a simular contract to what I mentioned above I would do it for him also. 

Bradford is worth less to me due to injury history. He has just has too many season ending injuries. I am sure he will play well when he is well, but that just isn't happening enough for me to make him a long term offer at this point with his age.

---