(12-28-2017, 09:28 AM)SeldomRite Wrote:

(12-28-2017, 09:24 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: No, I'm not into re-writing history.   I'm talking about this year's draft.  I've seen some mocks having us taking a WR with our first pick. 

I'm just saying, what if we did the same thing we did with Ramsey-Bouye?    If we did that at WR, imagine, how would teams defend that?  Leonard Fournette would have 1500 yards, easy.

I'd say it's more about offensive line and QB than WR. Parnell isn't a young guy, and guard could still use some shoring up. Also a great QB would make it work well with Robinson, Cole, and Westbrook.

If the only elite prospect at the Jaguars pick is a WR then by all means take them, but if offensive line were graded similarly I'd hope they'd go for the big guy.

Yeah... while the thought of having two game breaking WRs on the outside is nice... we don't actually know if we don't already.
If AR15 is back, plus Westbrook and Cole is emerging I'm not sure there's a rookie WR that is going to be that much better than any of those three.

For the "right now" OL, TE, QB are positions of most interest on offense. And on D I would say interior DL (Because I'm unsure of the play/contracts of certain players like Jones, Jackson, and Dareus) and S and possibly a NB.
And in my  position groupings, I'd put all 6 of these positions as a higher need than WR. Unless for some reason Lee and AR15 are gone, then perhaps it becomes more pertinent.

But as you said.. if there is an 'elite' WR prospect there that is head and shoulders above anyone else, you take the BAP I imagine

---