Login

MalabarJag · 12-31-2017, 02:48 PM

(12-31-2017, 01:28 PM)Adam2012 Wrote:
(12-31-2017, 01:10 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: You only said circumstantial evidence (hardly even that).

Is it collusion when you work out deals with other countries? No.

Trump isn't best friends with Putin. He only realizes that there's no reason to be hostile to them like Clinton wanted. I'd put money on you defending Obama when he tried to appease other countries.

Jumped at the chance? You do realize that the dossier was purchased by Clinton and the DNC so they could jump at the chance, right?

You can't honestly believe that the proof given in a fake dossier, which was first report by freakin' BuzzFeed because no one else would, is the same as the things Hillary is known to have done? If you genuinely believe they're the same then there's no point talking about it.

Hey - you could work for Fox News!

Do you live in a cave? I'm not talking about the dossier, I'm talking about Junior's meeting with the woman who later said she just wanted to talk about adoptions.

Oh, and what about Junior dealing with Wikileaks, which we all know if the front for Russian hacking?

It must be nice living in that warm, safe Fox/Brietbart bubble.

There's a huge difference between talking to a random Russian (even if she provided dirt on Hillary, which she didn't), vs. actually receiving money from a Russian government official after being involved in a deal that benefited the Russian government. It's not illegal to listen to what someone tells you, even if it's unapproved speech by the Left. It is illegal (and within the realm of treason) to sell US foreign policy for personal gain. OTOH, there was a payment from Hillary's campaign to Russia for (fabricated) dirt on Trump. Your princess had more dealings with Russia during the campaign than Trump.

What dealing did Junior have with Wikileaks? That someone told him about a story that was already released? Oh, the horrors! Time for the firing squad!

The evidence on Hillary is very strong. Although it may not stand up in court, it's obvious to anyone not totally clueless. Hillary pushed through the Uranium One deal. At the same time Bill got a fat speaking fee from a Russian official. And there are other instances of pay for policy involving Arab countries. You might want to note that the foreign gifts to the Clinton Foundation and fat speaking fees for Bill and Hillary dried up after Hillary no longer was in position to channel favors to foreign governments.

Are you going to claim that receiving payments in conjunction with Hillary's government decisions was just a coincidence? Talk about a warm safe bubble.

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"