(12-31-2017, 01:28 PM)Adam2012 Wrote:

(12-31-2017, 01:10 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: You only said circumstantial evidence (hardly even that). 

Is it collusion when you work out deals with other countries? No. 

Trump isn't best friends with Putin. He only realizes that there's no reason to be hostile to them like Clinton wanted. I'd put money on you defending Obama when he tried to appease other countries. 

Jumped at the chance? You do realize that the dossier was purchased by Clinton and the DNC so they could jump at the chance, right? 

You can't honestly believe that the proof given in a fake dossier, which was first report by freakin' BuzzFeed because no one else would, is the same as the things Hillary is known to have done? If you genuinely believe they're the same then there's no point talking about it.

Hey - you could work for Fox News!

Do you live in a cave? I'm not talking about the dossier, I'm talking about Junior's meeting with the woman who later said she just wanted to talk about adoptions.

Oh, and what about Junior dealing with Wikileaks, which we all know if the front for Russian hacking?

It must be nice living in that warm, safe Fox/Brietbart bubble.

Do you copy-and-paste all of your posts?

I don't watch Fox News, but that's the response I expect from someone that can't prove their point. 

I brought up the dossier because Clinton and the DNS "jumped at the chance" as you described it. You made it sound like, because Jr. went to get dirt on Clinton, that it proves collusion when it unequivocally does not. There's absolutely nothing illegal in what he did. If it were illegal then you'd be able to point out which law he broke.

Wikileaks is not a front for Russian hacking. Just because you said that it is, it doesn't make it so. Hillary used that talking point to deflect from he criminal activity. She was blaming the Russians before there was time to figure out who did it. Assange has already said the Russian government didn't do it. More than likely, it was someone from within the DNC.

---