The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Minimum Record Required for Playoffs
|
Both Seattle and Carolina got in with 7 wins. It's not likely for a team with 0 wins or even 3 wins to ever make the playoffs, but would you be comfortable with a 5 or 6 win team getting in over a team with 10 wins missing the playoffs. Mathematically, a team could miss the playoffs with 13 wins. Unlikely? Probably, but two teams with 11 wins have missed the playoffs (Denver and New England).
So, should the owners re-think the playoff structure? Should the best 6 records from each Conference go to the dance or should it be the top 12 records regardless of Conference? Or, do you like the current structure? |
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.