(01-17-2018, 11:38 AM)Krayz_Jville_D Wrote:

(01-17-2018, 11:35 AM)Rico Wrote: That has absolutely nothing to do with what you posted.

Do YOU think the Jaguars would have had this roster without the REBUILD.

that has EVERYTHING to do with what I posted.  I never said a rebuild wasn't necessary to gather talent.  WHAT I SAID WAS you should not allow a coach to have 4 years of 3 wins in a row and hide behind the rebuild moniker.

You can win quickly after rebuilding supplementing through free agency and making the right draft choices and having good coaching.  Good coaching is crucial

you guys are the ones arguing something different from the post.  Having Coughlin here last year and not Gus and us winning 5 more games than last year is EVERYTHING that I am posting about.

Rebuilding is eventually needed for everyone, unless you constantly are supplementing eventual replacements like the patriots.  Stop arguing something irrelevant.

Those of you who defended Gene for 4 years and Gus as well look ridiculous, and you can try to act like you dont all you want, doesn't change the facts

---

(01-17-2018, 11:37 AM)Rico Wrote: Sorry, you are really flailing in the wind here.

if putting me down makes you feel better about blindly following anyone who is coach at the time or GM at the time no matter how bad the results, then so be it, that's on you.

Get the right people in here running a football team, and things turn around much quicker

Okay...I still want to see where you advocated hiring Marrone before the hire, or lauded the choice immediately after it was made.

You are saying "I told you so" based solely on the fact we may have kept Bradley too long.

Anyone can say a coach should be fired.

But in your closing line here, you say "get the right people in here running a football team."

We can only assume that Marrone was the right person for this team.

If this is true, where was your advocacy for Marrone before or immediately after the hire?

---