Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
This is the kind of Bull[BLEEP] Propaganda I'm Talking About

#74
(This post was last modified: 01-21-2018, 06:44 AM by jachba. Edit Reason: clarity )

(01-20-2018, 11:27 AM)Phil Swift Wrote:
(01-20-2018, 08:15 AM)jachba Wrote: Take it from a Charger fan, your team actually matches up very well against the Pats. I recently read an article that compared the Jags defense to the three teams that have beaten New England in Foxboro in the playoffs. As it turns out, the Jags defense actually is better statistically than the defenses of the three teams previously mentioned. 

By the way, it is possible to limit the Pats offense in Foxboro: the Chargers did it in October, allowing them one offensive TD that day. In fact, take away the 2nd quarter (the TD, 2 FG'S and a safety) and the Chargers win by limiting the Pats to 6 points.

LOL....Love it when someone chirps in with the "shoulda....coulda....woulda..."  scenario.  "Close" only counts in Darts and Horseshoes.
The main argument of my post was that the Jags D is actually better than the defenses of the three teams that have beaten New England at Foxboro. Everything after "By the way..." was thrown in as a secondary point.
The main part of the secondary point was the limiting of the Pats offense to one offensive TD and how the Jags D could accomplish this task because the Charger D has already done that. The 2nd quarter reference was thrown in to further reinforce the point that the Patriot offence could be shut down at home.  So naturally you focused on the least important part of the secondary point (thereby missing the gist of the main argument) and ignored the most relevant points....
Reply


Messages In This Thread
ricko1112 - by ricko1112 - 01-18-2018, 06:32 PM
RE: ricko1112 - by B2hibry - 01-18-2018, 06:37 PM
ricko1112 - by ricko1112 - 01-18-2018, 06:45 PM
RE: ricko1112 - by Bullseye - 01-18-2018, 07:16 PM
ricko1112 - by ricko1112 - 01-18-2018, 08:08 PM
RE: ricko1112 - by MoJagFan - 01-18-2018, 08:22 PM
ricko1112 - by ricko1112 - 01-18-2018, 08:56 PM
RE: ricko1112 - by FBT - 01-19-2018, 05:10 PM
ricko1112 - by ricko1112 - 01-19-2018, 08:43 AM
ricko1112 - by ricko1112 - 01-19-2018, 12:01 PM
Jags - by Jags - 01-19-2018, 04:08 PM
RE: This is the kind of Bull[BLEEP] Propaganda I'm Talking About - by jachba - 01-21-2018, 06:29 AM



Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!