(01-21-2018, 08:25 PM)JaguarJosh05 Wrote: Ball hung in the air and even though Ramsey turned and looked for it he jumped on the receiver's back before the ball got there. You notice how Gilmore defended Westbrook on that 3rd down? They were more sound in the clutch than we were. It's just as simple as that. Defense wasn't good enough. Offense wasn't good enough. We needed a knock out blow and never got it.

PI on Ramsey was fine

Penalty on Church too (but there is nothing else he could do, maybe blow up his knees?)

The PI on Bouye was garbage.  Bouye had perfect coverage. (cost 7 points)

The no calls on holding on their O-Line was garbage.

Blowing Jack dead when he wasn't was garbage (cost 7 points).

Failing to call PI on Marcedes Lewis was garbage

Officiating should not favor one team or the other unfairly.

---

(01-21-2018, 08:26 PM)spaceballs12345 Wrote:

(01-21-2018, 06:54 PM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: Title says it all

commmeeee  onnn... how can anybody watch this and not see the incredible amount of holding calls  the jags got away with, it was nearly every pass attempt they were holding pat receivers??...from the bottom of my heart,ive never seen so many non-calls.............  pats still won.......  jags are great with a lot of fantastic players,,,even on offense they got some capable players...  pats are just a little bit better(for atleast this season)......

This is a joke or your'e drunk right?

---

(01-21-2018, 08:26 PM)Scarecrow Wrote:

(01-21-2018, 08:20 PM)Phil Swift Wrote: That's total nonsense....and sour grapes.  The PI call against Cooks?  That was the CLASSIC example of PI....interferred with the receiver's ability to get to the ball!

Not even debatable.

The ball was uncatchable.

Was Cooks even inbounds?

Nope, Bouye had perfect D and had run him out of bounds.

---