Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Gutless playcalling lost this game.

#90
(This post was last modified: 01-21-2018, 09:43 PM by Spots.)

(01-21-2018, 09:15 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:
(01-21-2018, 09:06 PM)irontrooper83 Wrote: I agree with most of these points.
On offense I think in the final quarter we got way too conservative, especially after recovering the fumble we should have tried to do more as we weren't pinned back on our 10 yards line like most of the other times. Same mistake we did when we got the INT against Buffalo in their territory.
I was hoping they would make Bortles run more, there were some first-second down situations (one on the final drive right before the 2 minutes warning timeout) where there was good room in front of him and went for a difficult throw.  What happened to Grant or Yeldon? We didn't even try to feed them anymore at some point.

On defense I find our soft zone infuriating to be honest, that's something I really hate about Wash as it's not the first time we play that soft giving 10 yards of cushion to the receiver and no pressure on the QB. Or just sitting back, we have enought talent to force them to beat us 1vs1 (especially after Gronk was out) and I felt we weren't aggressive enough.

It's small details but combine that with the refs not calling anything against them at all and in a close game like this you pay for it unfortunately.
Yes on the bolded. Missed opportunity there. 

Blake probably could have run for the first on that late fourth down as well. 

On the zone stuff, they didn't really play it that much, but man was it ugly a few times. I hope they make some adjustments there moving forward. I'd like more aggressive press coverage more often too.

It would be prudent if they can come up with a mixed man/zone coverage to keep the opposing offense off-balance, not just man-exclusive or zone-exclusive setups. But if zone were to work, we need a penetrating edge rusher, DE or LB.

They could have run more rollouts or option plays, but they didn't. I hope this game will serve as a lesson burned into their memories and use it for improvement. 

Like in chess - you don't get stronger by finding stronger moves, you get stronger by getting rid of your weaknesses.

(01-21-2018, 09:41 PM)irontrooper83 Wrote:
(01-21-2018, 09:15 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: Yes on the bolded. Missed opportunity there. 

Blake probably could have run for the first on that late fourth down as well. 

On the zone stuff, they didn't really play it that much, but man was it ugly a few times. I hope they make some adjustments there moving forward. I'd like more aggressive press coverage more often too.

I hope they will adjust but I'm doubtful, at least with Wash as DC.
I'm not saying he's done a bad job, the team is well prepared. I just don't get it why we stop being "ourselves" and let the D be more aggressive when we are up with a lead. Even against the Steelers the cushion we were giving them was absurd.
It wasn't that bad today but definitely not enough.

I can understand Hackett having to scheme around our QB weaknesses and therefore getting too conservative (still should have been more creative) but Wash literally has all the talent to be more aggressive and I hope they improve that.

Bortles didn't do a bad job, but I was expecting more play-action to help him out.
[Image: je8Z3fs.gif]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Jagsfanclubofmd - by JagsFanClubOfMD - 01-21-2018, 07:36 PM
etdavis2006 - by Etdavis2006 - 01-21-2018, 07:25 PM
RE: Gutless playcalling lost this game. - by tyus - 01-21-2018, 08:01 PM
RE: Gutless playcalling lost this game. - by Spots - 01-21-2018, 09:42 PM
Falls on the coaches - by flgatorsandjags - 01-21-2018, 07:31 PM
RE: Falls on the coaches - by JaguarJosh05 - 01-21-2018, 07:36 PM
RE: Falls on the coaches - by Dixon - 01-21-2018, 07:36 PM
RE: Falls on the coaches - by Bullseye - 01-21-2018, 07:36 PM
RE: Falls on the coaches - by B2hibry - 01-21-2018, 07:37 PM
RE: Falls on the coaches - by The_Franchise_QB - 01-21-2018, 07:37 PM
RE: Falls on the coaches - by Jagsfan32277 - 01-21-2018, 07:54 PM
RE: Falls on the coaches - by atburg - 01-21-2018, 08:06 PM
RE: Falls on the coaches - by Setsuna00 - 01-21-2018, 08:15 PM
RE: Falls on the coaches - by I am Yoda - 01-21-2018, 08:14 PM
RE: Falls on the coaches - by Jagsfan32277 - 01-21-2018, 08:30 PM
Fortunes favour the Bold - by K-Dub - 01-22-2018, 12:24 PM
RE: Fortunes favour the Bold - by flsprtsgod - 01-22-2018, 12:33 PM
RE: Fortunes favour the Bold - by Bchbunnie4 - 01-22-2018, 12:40 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!