(01-27-2018, 01:24 PM)nate Wrote:

(01-27-2018, 01:13 PM)SeldomRite Wrote: That's a good point, the perceived talent at a position in the draft makes a difference, which is part of why taking Fournette in the top five was such a bad move.

Ridiculous.  Look at our leading rusher for 2016 for crying out loud.... like 400 some yards.  Getting Fournette changed the entire Offense, despite not having their only top receiving threat all year.

Fournette, in my view, was worth 3-4 games by himself.  Adding a few more pieces on O will make things better.  

Our whole team changes on O, and this is a "bad move".............Just No.

You're fooling yourself. Fournette has talent, but he definitely wasn't the difference between 10-6 and 6-10.

I'm not even sure the Jaguars don't win another two or three games with my suggested draft picks instead of him.

The guy was hobbled by injury for most of the season and in the games he was healthy for the defense did more to secure the wins than he did.

Plus the team arguably had better games with him not in the lineup. Whether that's because he's not as good as his backup or because the coaches get stupid when he's in the game you can decide, but it's still a fact.

---