(02-02-2018, 12:55 AM)Eric1 Wrote:

(02-02-2018, 12:43 AM)Upper Wrote: A lot of this disagreement is based on a lot of people assuming that Cousins is only slightly above average, as I have seen stated many times on the last few pages. If people could be convinced that there was a clear and significant upgrade the money would become a non issue.

Here are Cousins 3 starting years of + stats (Y/A+ NY/A+ AY/A+ ANY/A+ Cmp%+ TD%+ Int%+ Sack%+ Rate+ tallied so that 100 is league average).

111 114 112 114 128 111 107 112 118
122 126 115 119 117 97 107 120 112
111 104 108 104 106 109 99 92 108

That's a whole lot of above average to way above average, and most importantly remarkable consistent above average. The exact type of consistent that would do wonders for an offense with a dominant defense. Worth the money.

Why hasn't he won more games and carried his team then? 26-30-1 and a 0-1 record is not good my man.

How many games have we won the last 4 years?

---

(02-01-2018, 11:50 PM)Mr.Scarface Wrote: Ask yourself this Question...if All are healthy, rank the AFC South QBs.

1. Luck
2. Watson (just because he hasn't played a full season)
3. MM
4. Bortles.

Do you REALLY want to put all your eggs in the Bortles basket?

Nope thats not how my list looks at all. MM is definately last at this point. Watson needs a whole season before I put him above Bortles. And even tho I know luck is better, he needs to play again too before you put him back on top. Our division is weak, mostly do to injury at QB. Thats one thing Bortles doesn't have issues with.

---