The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
If not Blake, who is your choice?
|
(02-09-2018, 06:05 PM)Gettin\ Jaggy with it Wrote:(02-09-2018, 05:32 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: No. Most of the best QB's in the NFL were drafted by their current teams. QB is the face of the team, Brady, Rodgers, Roethlisberger, Wilson, Stafford, Ryan, Rivers and Newton were all drafted by their current teams and allowed to develop. Our defense is a unit made up of a nice mix of guys we drafted, (Ramsey, Smith, Jack, Ngakoue) and guys we signed in free agency, (Campbell, Bouye, Dareus, Gipson and Church.) You need a healthy dose of both to balance the unit. It's not a single position like QB is. I don't think so. I just pulled up a trade value chart from 2014 and it has the same value points as the one from this year. Not to mention that we would be giving them 3 potential veteran starters and I may have undervalued them. To a team like the Colts who are desperate for any type of starters outside of QB, they would be worth their weight in gold. I really do think everything would even out and that's if we went all the way up to #3. You never know. We may not even have to trade up that far. Say the Browns decide on taking Allen or Darnold, the Giants decide to keep Manning and address OT with the #2 pick, opting to wait until rounds 2 or 3 to address QB and Denver trades for Kirk Cousins. That would only leave us to worry about the Jets selecting either Rosen or Mayfield and we potentially wouldn't have to trade up inside the top 10. We could do a deal with anyone from Pick #11 to #14 (Miami, Cincinnati, Washington or Green Bay), to stay ahead of Arizona and select whichever QB the Jets didn't take. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.