(03-07-2018, 07:43 PM)JackCity Wrote:

(03-07-2018, 07:35 PM)Etdavis2006 Wrote: Of course we would have been better with him but I’m am dealing with what happened not hypotheticals. 

The facts are we went to an AFC title game without him and had a top 11 offense. He did tear his ACL prior to any of that happening and his last good year was 2015. Am I missing something?

---

You damn right I would lol. No one is saying he sucks. I don’t think I’ve said that. But it’s not the end of the world without him like some believe. We literally witnessed what that looks like last year. I have never seen him contribute to a winning season. On top of that he tore his ACL. Why are we dismissing this fact?

Everything I’m talking about is based on what we witnessed. Everything you are speaking on is what you think would happen. We will never see eye to eye when that is the case.

Yes we had a great season in 2017 without our #1 24 year old pro bowl caliber receiver.  Unfortunately we are talking about 2018 and beyond now.

That doesn't mean its a good or wise decision for the front office to let him go either. We would have been better with him last year and we will be better with him if he was here next year. 

We have the cap to do it and enough flexibility for it have little impact down the line.    

It would be a no brainer to most teams to keep him.

---

(03-07-2018, 07:42 PM)Etdavis2006 Wrote: It’s not all or nothing for me. I can want the guy back but say good riddance if the price isn’t right lol.

Very simple concept

What would the right price be for you?