Not to go all "Jungle Cat" on folks, but I started thinking about the intent of this thread. It seemed to me that the OP was wanting to fill a gap in a perceived profile of WR. "Okay! We've got the 'quick but not fast slot' guy there, we've got the 'deep threat' guy over here, now we need a 'big body, high point' the ball guy!" But why not just get the best WRs that we can?

Look at the WR group that Pittsburgh rolls out. While they do have size in terms of Bryant, what they really have are productive Wideouts who catch the damn ball. Brown and Smith-Schuster are both sub 6' 2" guys, but they were both productive.

I guess the point I'm trying to make is that if you want to replace a player, then get the best player that you can, and don't rely on stereotypes.

---