(03-14-2018, 09:36 AM)homebiscuit Wrote:

(03-14-2018, 09:08 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: I agree with a lot of what you say about Hillary Clinton, but my point wasn't really that.   My point was, here is something pretty noteworthy, but that Fox News has chosen to screen it out, not cover it, because it doesn't fit their agenda.   I would wager that if Trey Gowdy had said the opposite, they would have reported it.  

All Fox News does these days is support Trump, and attack liberals, and ignore stuff that doesn't fit their agenda, and that's an example of how people who watch Fox News get pushed further and further to the right.

I read this as you’re wondering why Fox News isn’t making the same breathless announcement of old news in an obvious attempt at bias like the MSM channels.

No, I'm just pointing out that Trey Gowdy, who was a conservative hero when he was going after Hillary Clinton on Bengazi, said something yesterday that disagreed with the party line, and therefore Fox News ignored it.  

And I'm also stating my firm opinion that if he had said the opposite, Fox News would have covered it. 

And I'm also stating my opinion that one of the biggest reasons we are so polarized is that most of us pick news sources that don't disturb our pre-existing opinions on the issues.   Did the Russians intervene in our election in an attempt to defeat Hillary Clinton and get Trump elected?   I know one thing for sure- if they did, you'll never hear it from Fox News.

---