(03-14-2018, 10:37 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:

(03-14-2018, 10:28 AM)B2hibry Wrote: You don't see it on Fox as "breaking news" because it is, well, old news. What the left seems to selectively forget is that the numerous investigations were/are for "collusion". There is no such legal definition and so far there has been no such illegal activities that would fit any definition. I don't believe there is any doubt that Russia and other countries made a social media push for and against Clinton during the election season.

As for Fox News, if you are really wanting to browse for information out of curiosity sake and not trying to simply find something to complain about, there is a whole section devoted to the Russian investigation.

http://www.foxnews.com/category/news-eve...ation.html

https://gowdy.house.gov/media-center/pre...estigation

"It is also clear, based on the evidence, Russia had disdain for Secretary Clinton and was motivated in whole or in part by a desire to harm her candidacy or undermine her Presidency had she prevailed."

Did you read that statement?  It's in one of the links you provided.  Not Fox News, of course.  And it's not "old news."  The date on that statement is March 13, 2018.  Yesterday.  Not "old news." 

Fox News does not want to show any evidence that Trump might have won because of Russian interference.   It doesn't fit their agenda, which is, to defend Trump and attack liberals.

Yes, did you read mine?
" I don't believe there is any doubt that Russia and other countries made a social media push for and against Clinton during the election season."

It's old news regardless of the statement date. It has been said over and over again since this so called investigation started. This same so called evidence can be viewed as helping Clinton beat Sanders, but that doesn't meet the agenda, right? Look, I know there are some pretty stupid people in America but if you think some tweets, snapchats, Facebook or whatever persuaded an election, that's pretty weak minded and idioctic in itself. Doesn't the left want to break down the electoral college because Clinton won the popular vote? Hmm. Russia interferes to get Trump in office but yet Clinton wins popular vote. Seems legit. Of course, you could run with the new narrative that angry white guys wouldn't let there wives vote for Clinton.

FYI, Fox has been critical of Trump but they won't join the useless trashing brigade. Speaking of media bias. Any reason CNN hasn't addressed the jobs tracker to reflect the actual growth? Doesn't meet the agenda huh.

http://money.cnn.com/interactive/news/ec...s-tracker/

---