(03-21-2018, 07:13 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:

(03-20-2018, 09:46 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: Interesting how someone trained to use firearms at the school "stopped the action" so quickly in a "gun free zone".  What is more impressive is the trained person "stopped the action" with one shot.  Me personally, I've been trained to fire 3 shots.

Do liberals still not want trained personnel in a school whether it's a "resource officer" or a teacher?

I can't answer for the "liberals" because I'm not a liberal.   But wasn't the "resource officer" at the school a police officer?   In fact, he was trained as a SWAT team member.   I'm totally in favor of police officers having guns.  Teachers, on the other hand, can be pretty wacky.  I'm unsure about giving guns to teachers.  Some of the teachers I had in high school would have no business going around armed with a gun.

I felt that way about a lot of the kids that had handguns at my high school (they weren't legally obtained, by the way), yet they still carried them in once the metal detectors went down.

This wasn't a school shooting, to me anyway, she was his ex-girlfriend or something like that.. this was a targeted attack. I mean, yea, it was at a school but a school shooting, to me, is a crazy douche who tries to kill as many random people as he can.

---