(03-25-2018, 12:19 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote:

(03-25-2018, 09:00 AM)rollerjag Wrote: Unless you can prove anyone criticizing Trump in this thread also insulted Melania for her photos, you're just full of [BLEEP]. What's really funny is a Trumpette who used Melania as an example of Trump being a "winner" now calling her a golddigger to deflect criticism of his boy.

I have no doubt you will look the other way regarding Trump's past, and use Bill Clinton's behavior as justification. I have no doubt you will continue to look away if his accuser's accusation of physical intimidation prove to be true. It's fun having no doubts, especially when one isn't a mind reader.

Oh, I'm sorry. As if providing proof for you would change you lying about it. This would be no different than when you implied critiques of Obama were racist. I provided quotes then and you simply changed the meaning of words. Besides, I didn't say those members were in this thread or that you were one. There is a thread about how Melania may or may not look like a hooker and even talk about her nudes. 

I never called Trump a winner for Melania. I don't even know where you're getting that from. But, for the purpose of this argument, one could absolutely say he's a winner for her and her simultaneously be a golddigger. Although, I'm not calling her one; I just don't think she's surprised by these allegations made against Trump.

Clinton's problem was lying--under oath. Are you saying these two things are the same? 

You "have no doubt"? If Trump lies under oath, then I'll support impeachment too. It's easy for you to make up these imaginary situations for you to accuse me of being a certain type of person.

I was in favor of impeaching Clinton for perjury.  

But, that said, I would point out the existence of something they call a "perjury trap."   If Trump ever actually goes for a deposition under oath with Mueller, Mueller will ask him questions that he, Mueller, already knows the answer to, and if Trump, who has a very hard time telling the truth all the time, tells a lie, Mueller will have him on a perjury charge.   It's what happened to Clinton.  

So if I were Trump, I wouldn't go near Mueller.   And I would justify my avoidance by saying, "If Mueller can give me some justification for continuing this investigation, including some way in which my testimony would be required to wrap it up, I will come in and talk to him.  But unless he can produce some evidence of collusion or some crime on my part, he can forget it.  I'm too busy making America great again blah blah blah."

---