Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades

TheO-LineMatters
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12,116
Threads: 97
Joined: Jul 2017
Reputation: 250

#21

04-08-2018, 02:49 AM

(04-08-2018, 02:21 AM)JackCity Wrote:
(04-07-2018, 11:57 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: I agree.

If the Pats take Rudolph, I'll be sick. It'll be like the Colts going from Peyton Manning to Andrew Luck or the San Antonio Spurs going from David Robinson to Tim Duncan.

Hahahahaha, relax.

Rudolph is likely the 5th QB of the board. He ain't Tim Duncan and he ain't Andrew Luck.

I'm not necessarily saying he is, but for a franchise like New England, who has more or less formed a dynasty under Tom Brady to land a QB the caliber of Rudolph, would almost be unfair. I believe he will be a very good NFL QB. Nowhere near Tom Brady, but good enough to keep the Pats in the playoffs after Brady would retire. I am hoping they choose a "dud" and fall completely out of contention. I'm sick of seeing them in the playoffs and certainly sick of seeing them in the Superbowl.

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!

Messages In This Thread

Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by JNev - 04-07-2018, 03:15 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by Upper - 04-07-2018, 04:41 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by TheO-LineMatters - 04-07-2018, 04:46 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by brianmsbc - 04-07-2018, 05:09 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by TheO-LineMatters - 04-07-2018, 05:49 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by brianmsbc - 04-08-2018, 08:23 AM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by TheO-LineMatters - 04-08-2018, 08:31 AM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by brianmsbc - 04-08-2018, 08:46 AM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by NYC4jags - 04-08-2018, 09:45 AM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by Bullseye - 04-08-2018, 11:09 AM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by jaglou53 - 04-07-2018, 04:46 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by JNev - 04-07-2018, 04:53 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by JackCity - 04-07-2018, 05:30 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by Caldrac - 04-07-2018, 08:01 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by JackCity - 04-07-2018, 08:15 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by TheO-LineMatters - 04-07-2018, 08:34 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by JackCity - 04-07-2018, 08:41 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by TheO-LineMatters - 04-07-2018, 08:47 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by JackCity - 04-07-2018, 09:09 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by Jagsfan32277 - 04-07-2018, 08:58 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by Caldrac - 04-07-2018, 09:22 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by JagswinJagswin - 04-07-2018, 11:47 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by Caldrac - 04-07-2018, 11:54 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by TheO-LineMatters - 04-07-2018, 11:57 PM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by JackCity - 04-08-2018, 02:21 AM

RE: Chad Reuter's 5 RD Mock With Trades - by TheO-LineMatters - 04-08-2018, 02:49 AM

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.