(04-11-2018, 05:03 PM)rufftime Wrote:

(04-11-2018, 03:19 PM)JAGFAN88 Wrote: How is luck easily better if hes healthy? Just because espn and nfl network say he is the second coming does not make it true. His stats when he was heallthy are not much better then BB5. Im just not convinced he is as good as advertised he played against a very week divison his first few seasons.

              Luck 5 years                          BB5 4 years

TD -Int     132-68                                     90-64
COMP %    59.2                                         59.1
YARDS     19,078                                      14,928
P RAT.       87.3                                          80.8

Well according to your own data, Blake would have to throw 42 TDs to 4 interceptions next year to catch Luck.  That alone seems like a clear answer if everything else is equal.

I'll give you that, wont mention that we where a very low scoring team and it was a team effort not just blake as to why we didnt score more TDs. But if that is the only difference in those stats it just Confirms that Luck is not easily better then BB5 but they are similar in yards and completeion percentage and qb rating. My point is that Given if they all where healthy i think Blake is the best QB, but i will admit i have a biased against Luck because i have never seen him perform to the Goat level that the networks put on him, and some here believe in.

---