(05-22-2018, 08:27 AM)B2hibry Wrote:

(05-22-2018, 07:18 AM)Achilles Wrote: https://washingtonpress.com/2018/05/17/a...ent-viral/

Maybe there is no "foot in mouth" clause, but whether you like it or not, he's been removed from his office building with no recourse, and he's facing disbarment and working against the government now. He's toast, and he deserves it. 

If you research him on the internet you'll find that he's a white supremacist, he has more videos out there where he either speaks hatefully towards people he thinks are immigrants or bumps into them and threatens to call the police. The guy is a bag of garbage and he's getting his just desserts.

The guy may be a tool bag, but your statement about no recourse and inevitable disbarment are false. Our rights are not assigned based on individual morals and ethics. Fortunately, law doesn’t typically rule on feelings and emotion either. While I don’t support his behavior, this guy can sue for numerous reason and would win. As far as the Congressman, this is a states issue where he has zero jurisdiction, unless this attorney files a constitutional rights grievance at the federal level. This may happen if he is disbarred based on public pressure, not cause.

Your link is nothing more than a synopsis of some exchanges and who is bothered. Discussion here was beyond that. If you are responding to my post based on “law”, perhaps you could provide a legal basis for why you think he has no remedy and he can’t continue to practice law based on his actions. 

Could you imagine if, lets say, Wells Fargo could just terminate your mortgage contract and kick you out simply because you are a ****?

I said he's facing disbarment.... I didn't say it was inevitable.

And the statement about no recourse is not false. He is no longer allowed to conduct his business in that space and there is nothing he can do about it. If you think he can or will do anything about it and come out victorious, I'll go ahead and place a bet with you now that you're wrong.

---