(05-29-2018, 10:37 PM)rollerjag Wrote:

(05-29-2018, 03:03 PM)B2hibry Wrote: The system is soo broke they can't track the location of those who crossed legally and you think they can come up precisely where the illegal crossed? This is the type of semantics not worthy of argument.

“Southern border” shall mean the contiguous land border between the United States and Mexico, including all points of entry.
“Wall” shall mean a contiguous, physical wall or other similarly secure, contiguous, and impassable physical barrier.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-...rovements/

In what other situation do you support a solution when the problem isn't clearly defined?

I know what a wall is, and I know what Trump wants when he says he will build a wall. The semantics are very clear.

Not sure where you've been, but the problem/root cause is very clear. The solution is multi-fold with a wall just being one piece of that solution.

Not questioning whether or not you know what "a" wall is, but whether or not you know what "this" wall is to be, along with it's infrastructure.

As far as where the illegal entered, it's been said before...doesn't matter and doesn't make it any more or less illegal. However, it does reinforce the belief that a porous border needs rapid improvement.

---