(05-29-2018, 11:33 PM)B2hibry Wrote:

(05-29-2018, 10:37 PM)rollerjag Wrote: In what other situation do you support a solution when the problem isn't clearly defined?

I know what a wall is, and I know what Trump wants when he says he will build a wall. The semantics are very clear.

Not sure where you've been, but the problem/root cause is very clear. The solution is multi-fold with a wall just being one piece of that solution.

Not questioning whether or not you know what "a" wall is, but whether or not you know what "this" wall is to be, along with it's infrastructure.

As far as where the illegal entered, it's been said before...doesn't matter and doesn't make it any more or less illegal. However, it does reinforce the belief that a porous border needs rapid improvement.

I am aware there is more to border security than a wall, but I also know if any funding bill does not include money for a physical wall Trump will oppose it. Not because it makes sense, not because it is essential, but because he made a promise designed to appeal to his base, and he clings to his base. When he talks about a wall, he means what he says. A physical wall. Billions of dollars because something sounds cool.

The OP cited a murder case and exclaimed "This is why we need a wall", it is ridiculous to say it doesn't matter how the the murderer entered the country.

---