(06-11-2018, 01:51 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: He clearly states he's including injured players who "seem to be healthy again," but Watt's inclusion (especially so high) is still pretty dumb. If he's on the list, it's somewhere near the bottom.

I wonder what Watt's stat line will be like this season?  7 starts and 4.5 sacks? Maybe?  I don't trust he'll be healthy all season nor do I think he returns to form.

Yes, it's not that he didn't explain his rationale, which is why I could understand including someone that had performed in any capacity approaching top ten in the league at some point in the previous two seasons WHEN they actually were playing, but it's not like Watt didn't play at all last year, he did play, and he was getting put on his rear all game by the Jaguars, and I didn't see anything of significance from him in any of his other appearances, either.

There's nothing at this point to indicate he's going to turn back the clock five years and start being a difference maker again. Including him as a top 10 is absurd, and even at the back end of the top 100 would be too much. I honestly expect Myles Jack, a guy that didn't even make Prisco's list, will have a bigger impact in 2018 than JJ Watt will.

---