Yeah.. on that point, you originally said "Every head coach you've been uber high on and advised the Jags to hire when they had or should have had an opening, i.e. Harbaugh, Kelly, McCoy, O'Brien, has been a good one." (I'm paraphrasing here)

 

I asked you to provide supportive evidence in the case of O'Brien in another thread and you basically boiled it down to it, like, just being your opinion, man.  Which is all well and good, but is still not really evidence.

 

Then I argued a series of points on Ferentz whom you had previously pounded the table (Viva Kouvaris!) for and whom I do not feel is worthy of a head coaching job in the NFL, and you, again, provided no real evidence as to why he is a good coach other than the fact he has had two losing seasons in an average-at-best conference in thirteen years, despite the fact no NFL team has come calling on him "publicly" for any position.  And I was accused of "spinning" things by providing facts to support my notion that he is..   "meh."

 

So..  again, we are at an impasse where your opinion, with lack of any tangible supportive evidence, supersedes facts or at the very least compelling arguments I make to support the theories that O'Brien and Ferentz, who may some day hoist a dozen Lombardi trophies each (in theory) have done and shown nothing to validate the position you take that they are not only very good coaches, but coaches the Jaguars should or should have hired, presumably instead of the current staff.

---